Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday May 28 2019, @11:08PM   Printer-friendly
from the chips-will-soon-design-themselves dept.

From ieee spectrum

Engineers at Georgia Tech say they've come up with a programmable prototype chip that efficiently solves a huge class of optimization problems, including those needed for neural network training, 5G network routing, and MRI image reconstruction. The chip's architecture embodies a particular algorithm that breaks up one huge problem into many small problems, works on the subproblems, and shares the results. It does this over and over until it comes up with the best answer. Compared to a GPU running the algorithm, the prototype chip—called OPTIMO—is 4.77 times as power efficient and 4.18 times as fast.

[...] The test chip was made up of a grid of 49 "optimization processing units," cores designed to perform ADMM and containing their own high-bandwidth memory. The units were connected to each other in a way that speeds ADMM. Portions of data are distributed to each unit, and they set about solving their individual subproblems. Their results are then gathered, and the data is adjusted and resent to the optimization units to perform the next iteration. The network that connects the 49 units is specifically designed to speed this gather and scatter process.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Farkus888 on Wednesday May 29 2019, @01:05AM (2 children)

    by Farkus888 (5159) on Wednesday May 29 2019, @01:05AM (#848724)

    It is intentional to get people to speed less. No long running start to get going fast. Is it safer than the rear end and red light runner accidents it causes? I'd wager the study was never done. Incidentally a traffic circle slows people down from every direction at all times instead of just half the time from one direction. It does that without making traffic from any direction stop for minutes on end as well.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Wednesday May 29 2019, @03:01AM (1 child)

    by RS3 (6367) on Wednesday May 29 2019, @03:01AM (#848752)

    What you're saying is right, so this rant is directed at the govt. and other's who think this is a good thing.

    I'm not a fan of traffic circles because they force you to slow down (waste energy unless you have regenerative braking) no matter what the traffic volume is.

    It is NOT fair, just, nor right for a govt. to punish a law-abiding citizen. I go the speed limit or less and the light turns red.

    How about we charge them for the brake dust pollution, brake jobs, gasoline, and a carbon tax that comes out of their personal pockets? When the few are overruling the many, something's wrong.

    If / when we all have self-driving electric vehicles, I won't mind- I can study, browse, nap, watch TV / movie. Until then, govt. should promote more efficient society, or get out of the way.

    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Farkus888 on Wednesday May 29 2019, @06:39AM

      by Farkus888 (5159) on Wednesday May 29 2019, @06:39AM (#848804)

      Traffic circles have a narrow use case. 2 lanes crossing 2 lanes with light traffic signal volume down through 4 way stop but not including 2 way stop signs. Speed limits already set low due to other conditions, 35 mph seems like a good upper limit. 0 person time wasted sitting at lights and far less energy wasted by not crossing through the 15 to 0 mph range and then back up. In that scenario they are by far most efficient for travelers. That makes up a huge percentage of intersections outside the major cities.