Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday May 29 2019, @07:55PM   Printer-friendly
from the Alarum!-Alarum! dept.

'We're Not Being Paranoid': U.S. Warns Of Spy Dangers Of Chinese-Made Drones

Drones have become an increasingly popular tool for industry and government. Electric utilities use them to inspect transmission lines. Oil companies fly them over pipelines. The Interior Department even deployed them to track lava flows at Hawaii's Kilauea volcano.

But the Department of Homeland Security is warning that drones manufactured by Chinese companies could pose security risks, including that the data they gather could be stolen.

The department sent out an alert on the subject on May 20, and a video on its website notes that drones in general pose multiple threats, including "their potential use for terrorism, mass casualty incidents, interference with air traffic, as well as corporate espionage and invasions of privacy." "We're not being paranoid," the video's narrator adds.

Related: Department of Homeland Security Terror Bulletin Warns of "Weaponized Drones"


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by hemocyanin on Thursday May 30 2019, @12:10AM (5 children)

    by hemocyanin (186) on Thursday May 30 2019, @12:10AM (#849121) Journal

    It isn't just stolen IP -- that is worth whatever it is worth now and has some short term value. What China got out of offshoring was the generalized know-how in high tech manufacturing processes as well as examples of marketable design/software/hardware/whatever -- the tools to do things and examples of how to do them (*). The knowledge gained in this learning stage can only mean that Chinese manufacturers and developers will at some point exceed the capabilities of those who sought a short term gain by closing up manufacturing here and moving it elsewhere. We have educated them, given them their first jobs, and now they're close to going off on their own.

    (*) I recently bought an eSATA/USB hard drive dock, Chinese made with some Chinese name as the manufacturer. The device works but what I really noticed, the packaging was Apple level nice, just beautiful. I've seen that more and more with various Chinese gadgets I've bought -- I see that super flimsy crappy corrugated cardboard or garish glossy design elements less and less -- a lot of the stuff is being packaged quite elegantly. Chinese manufacturers are really savvy -- they've done the hard labor for others for decades now and they've learned how to do it really well. They are at (or soon to be at) the point where they don't need those others anymore.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 30 2019, @01:06AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 30 2019, @01:06AM (#849135)

    Came to says this too.

    The whole 'china is stealing our IPeez' thing is heavily overblown. Yes, it's a problem for a small company when the exact product that was being produced in China is duplicated and resold under a Chinese brand for a quarter the price. That is one issue. But, I keep hearing talking heads going on like some Chinese guy finding out how Cisco or whoever are doing their networking is some sort of super trade secret that is lightyears ahead of general expertise in the field. This is bogus, the know-how and experience in the field is the biggest indicator of success in a company. Many western companies in the race for short term gains are outsourcing all of that overseas and keeping the 'management' (which is basically a sales network and branding). The problem with this is that over time, like the Japanese first, then the Koreans, the Taiwanese and Chinese brands for technology driven products will eventually become even more sought out than the western brands.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by takyon on Thursday May 30 2019, @02:05AM (2 children)

      by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Thursday May 30 2019, @02:05AM (#849154) Journal

      Or you are wrong.

      R&D is expensive and uncertain. Having a government-backed hacking operation to steal trade secrets for your company is a big help. The economic entanglement between the West and China only gives it more opportunities to steal information.

      You can't even fault China for this. It's the smart move, and they are largely getting away with it.

      That's not to say that China can't do it on their own [nytimes.com], but the Iceeu Pee theft is part of a winning strategy.

      --
      [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 30 2019, @02:18PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 30 2019, @02:18PM (#849295)

        "Trade secrets," should not be the issue unless one is concerned about hacking or more conventional forms of business espionage. I acknowledge this is exactly what you're aiming at, but this isn't the issue at hand here.

        This is basically government panic about the way drones can be used.

      • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday May 30 2019, @05:43PM

        by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday May 30 2019, @05:43PM (#849359) Journal

        It is karma. The United States industrialized so quickly by stealing trade secrets from the British back in the day.

        There must be a significant cultural component to the ability to internalize them, though. American companies have outsourced manufacturing to Mexico, also, but that country is in no way on its way to becoming anything but another level of basket case.

        --
        Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Farkus888 on Thursday May 30 2019, @12:30PM

      by Farkus888 (5159) on Thursday May 30 2019, @12:30PM (#849264)

      I use that as a metric of a company. The engineer, mechanic, coder and other similar doing the work jobs go on one side of the scale. The management, marketing and sales go on the other. If group 2 is bigger than group 1 the company is in long term trouble. The basic premise is that a good mechanic does not need marketing. People need things fixed, they will hunt the mechanic down. The group 2 people have nothing to offer without group 1. They slightly improve efficiency, can't improve the efficiency of nothing.