Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 12 2019, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the real-world-following-the-movies dept.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01448-4

Up to one million plant and animal species face extinction, many within decades, because of human activities, says the most comprehensive report yet on the state of global ecosystems.

Without drastic action to conserve habitats, the rate of species extinction — already tens to hundreds of times higher than the average across the past ten million years — will only increase, says the analysis. The findings come from a United Nations-backed panel called the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).

According to the report, agricultural activities have had the largest impact on ecosystems that people depend on for food, clean water and a stable climate. The loss of species and habitats poses as much a danger to life on Earth as climate change does, says a summary of the work, released on 6 May.

The analysis distils findings from nearly 15,000 studies and government reports, integrating information from the natural and social sciences, Indigenous peoples and traditional agricultural communities. It is the first major international appraisal of biodiversity since 2005. Representatives of 132 governments met last week in Paris to finalize and approve the analysis.

Biodiversity should be at the top of the global agenda alongside climate, said Anne Larigauderie, IPBES executive secretary, at a 6 May press conference in Paris, France. "We can no longer say that we did not know," she said.

"We have never had a single unified statement from the world's governments that unambiguously makes clear the crisis we are facing for life on Earth," says Thomas Brooks, chief scientist at the International Union for Conservation of Nature in Gland, Switzerland, who helped to edit the biodiversity analysis. "That is really the absolutely key novelty that we see here."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 12 2019, @06:41PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 12 2019, @06:41PM (#854772)

    Hence the big hoopla about affirmative action, something which barely impacts white people but has become a hot topic for the reasons you gave. To be fair it is preferential treatment so disliking AA doesn't mean you're racist, but it sure is blown out of proportion these days.

    I wonder if anyone has any kind of idea about when it should be repealed. Trying to fix human bias with legislation is one tricky problem.

  • (Score: 2) by Arik on Wednesday June 12 2019, @07:09PM

    by Arik (4543) on Wednesday June 12 2019, @07:09PM (#854786) Journal
    "Hence the big hoopla about affirmative action, something which barely impacts white people but has become a hot topic for the reasons you gave."

    The ones most disadvantaged by AA are actually "Asians."

    And here's yet another case where you can see the cracks in the whole racist edifice, the bankruptcy inherent in all racist thought.

    See.  we're trying to correct for opportunity based on group statistics rather than individual assessment, and that can never work properly.

    In the specific case of 'Asians' the racist theory of the mainstream says that since Asians as a group perform better on a number of scales, they must have an excess of opportunity as a 'race.' So we lower their test scores accordingly, and this is supposed to balance out their supposed good fortune.

    There are so many things wrong with this, but one HUGE one is the whole idea that there is some 'Asian race.' That's a racist assumption to begin with, and like every racist assumption it stumbles when expected to process reality. You lump ALL 'Asians' together in one big group and you crunch the numbers and there you go, we know what being Asian is. But we don't, not at all. Our numbers are highly weighted towards wealthy Chinese. So you get this poor Cambodian kid grows up in a slum trying to get into a school or get a job and he's being treated as if he were from a wealthy Chinese family, and by that yardstick he's suddenly not so appealing.

    And that's racism, pure and simple. We're not evaluating the person, we're dealing with a classification. A category we invented and imposed on that kid.

    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?