Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday June 12 2019, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the real-world-following-the-movies dept.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01448-4

Up to one million plant and animal species face extinction, many within decades, because of human activities, says the most comprehensive report yet on the state of global ecosystems.

Without drastic action to conserve habitats, the rate of species extinction — already tens to hundreds of times higher than the average across the past ten million years — will only increase, says the analysis. The findings come from a United Nations-backed panel called the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).

According to the report, agricultural activities have had the largest impact on ecosystems that people depend on for food, clean water and a stable climate. The loss of species and habitats poses as much a danger to life on Earth as climate change does, says a summary of the work, released on 6 May.

The analysis distils findings from nearly 15,000 studies and government reports, integrating information from the natural and social sciences, Indigenous peoples and traditional agricultural communities. It is the first major international appraisal of biodiversity since 2005. Representatives of 132 governments met last week in Paris to finalize and approve the analysis.

Biodiversity should be at the top of the global agenda alongside climate, said Anne Larigauderie, IPBES executive secretary, at a 6 May press conference in Paris, France. "We can no longer say that we did not know," she said.

"We have never had a single unified statement from the world's governments that unambiguously makes clear the crisis we are facing for life on Earth," says Thomas Brooks, chief scientist at the International Union for Conservation of Nature in Gland, Switzerland, who helped to edit the biodiversity analysis. "That is really the absolutely key novelty that we see here."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Wednesday June 12 2019, @08:24PM (2 children)

    by Freeman (732) on Wednesday June 12 2019, @08:24PM (#854819) Journal

    Being child-free in one of the countries with very minimal population growth, isn't necessarily helping anything. The reason why it's touted as a racist idea is, because essentially all of the fastest growing countries are in Africa. There's a very large correlation between wealth (the lack thereof) and population growth.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 13 2019, @02:08PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 13 2019, @02:08PM (#855141)

    There's a very large correlation between wealth (the lack thereof) and population growth.

    Which means the best means against population growth is to make those countries wealthy.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by FatPhil on Friday June 14 2019, @08:11AM

    by FatPhil (863) <pc-soylentNO@SPAMasdf.fi> on Friday June 14 2019, @08:11AM (#855437) Homepage
    The strongest correlation is with education. Women's education at that. (And don't start me on what I think of countries which have institutionalised inferior education for females...)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves