Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 14 2019, @07:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the shoulda-created-a-meta-app-called-iMedia dept.

Wharton marketing professor Peter Fader and sociology professor and director of the Center for Theory at the University of Texas at Arlington David Arditi recently speculated on the implications of Apple's announcement that Itunes will be shut down:

During its Worldwide Developers Conference this week in San Jose, California, Apple announced iTunes will no longer exist as a digital jukebox but will be reformed into three separate apps for music, television and podcasts. While the change has been a long time coming — sales of digital music downloads have dropped for six straight years, according to the Recording Industry Association of America — it marks a significant shift in the company's business model and in the kind of consumer behavior that Apple helped shape when it first opened the digital store in 2001. Music lovers were no longer bound to the full purchase of an album that was packaged and sold by a record label; they were free to buy single songs for 99 cents, which ushered in a new era of pick-and-choose consumption.

[...] Apple will continue to sell downloadable music through its iTunes store (located in its Apple Music app), but the repackaging of apps is a recognition that consumers are streaming content more than buying it. Music will be on one app, TV on another, and podcasts on another.

The professors aren't so sure that's a winning strategy. They described themselves as typical consumers who want all their content in one place.

"[Apple was] getting a lot of reports that people thought that iTunes was really clunky, so they wanted to find this way to streamline it, which was to break it into different apps, which seems kind of counterintuitive," Arditi said. "Now, instead of having one app for all these different things, you're going to have three, four, five apps to access different types of media."

Added Fader: "I had the same initial reaction, which is, 'This is not streamlining.'"

Originally spotted on The Eponymous Pickle.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 15 2019, @04:37AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 15 2019, @04:37AM (#855899)

    Tried Ubuntu when Win10 came out. Installed fine, then I tried to install Waterfox on it. Failed repeatedly. If I can't even do *that* on it, why bother? Dropped it again.

    I generally find a lot of what I need on StackExchange and distro web support forums. In fact, I usually find what I'm looking for in the first couple DDG search results, assuming my query is specific enough. IRC is kind of hit or miss, as you never know who will be online, or their level of interest or expertise in whatever it is you're trying to accomplish. In fact, I don't believe I've *ever* gotten decent help from IRC WRT to Linux. Then again, I'm not sure I ever *sought* assistance for Linux on IRC channels.

    I don't use Ubuntu, but a single web search gave me the answer [askubuntu.com] I would have required should I have needed to do so. However, it appears that Waterfox was less friendly for Ubuntu/other linux (i.e., an apt repository *from* Waterfox) until a year or two *after* you attempted installation.

    Which is more of an indictment of Waterfox than it is of Ubuntu IMHO (especially since even today Waterfox doesn't support formats [repology.org] of very many package managers), as the majority of Ubuntu software is managed through the 'apt' package manager. Had you chosen a different browser, your installation would most likely have been to open a GUI tool, select the package you wanted, and it would install the software, all dependencies and any pre-runtime configuration that might be required.

    All that said, I'm not suggesting that you attempt to install Linux (and Ubuntu would be one of my last recommendations) again.

    If you did, I think you'll find that many things have changed for the better.

    It's unfortunate that you're unhappy with the OS/hardware choice you made, but I'm sure you'll work it through.

    As an IT professional myself, I get your desire not to have to "work" at home. I'm a Unix guy from way back, so my level of comfort is probably much higher. If you're more of a Windows guy, I can certainly understand your discomfort with a completely different way of doing things, just to do leisure stuff at home.

    I'm less negative on playing with stuff at home. In fact, I'm going to snag Windows 10 and spin up a VM and some newer Windows (currently running 2008 & 2012, as MS killed off Technet and reasonably-priced MSDN quite a while ago...Grrr!) server VMs and spin them up too, as I'm curious.

    I hope you find something to your liking. Good luck!