RT:
WhatsApp is threatening users who violate its rules with lawsuits, even if the only evidence of “rule-breaking” exists outside of the Facebook-owned messaging app and the only judge is an AI.
“WhatsApp will take legal action against those we determine are engaged in or assisting others in abuse… even if that determination is based on information solely available to us off our platform,” the company warned in an ominous FAQ entry posted on Monday.
The source is RT, but the FAQ linked in the excerpt does say that. Would we want Kellogg's surveilling us to make sure we're using their corn flakes properly?
(Score: 2) by AthanasiusKircher on Friday June 14 2019, @10:31PM (5 children)
Is "Missuse" some sort of euphemism for something? Taking advantage of young women, perhaps? ("Miss use"?) More MeToo violations, coupled with dated inappropriate titles of address? That would explain the outrage...
/sarcasm
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 14 2019, @10:40PM (2 children)
Perhaps it means "Monetize in a way that WhatsApp cannot, but wants to"?
(Score: 2) by MostCynical on Saturday June 15 2019, @12:24AM (1 child)
1. set up lots of whatsapp accounts
2. ??
3. Profit!!
just how are these 'abuse' accounts making money?
If they are not making money, what are they doing?
(note: companies like Uber have never made any money, but people are making/taking money out of it, so maybe investors or advertisers are being bilked?)
Also, creating accounts should be easy for FB, using a server set up by a 'separate' company in an appropriate/tame country... maybe they just can't make the '??' bit work.
Additionally, maybe some (powerful/connected) users are complaining about some messages...
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Saturday June 15 2019, @01:02AM
In addition to misspelling "Misuse," TFS somehow did not include the link to the WhatsApp FAQ Entry [whatsapp.com] mentioned:
Apparently, WhatsApp *claims* (please note that this is my understanding of WhatsApp's FAQ entry. I am not making any claims on behalf of WhatsApp and not only have no idea if their claims have merit, but also I have *never* used WhatsApp, nor do I have *any* interest, financial or otherwise in the company or the service) that the issue is with "bulk messaging" (whatever that means. I could guess, but I won't) and automation of same.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 1) by NPC-131072 on Friday June 14 2019, @10:46PM (1 child)
Are we worried that poor Miss Use has been misused if the source is RT? realDonaldTrump Can you ask Putin if there was collusion or if the title is a Phoenix666 original?
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Saturday June 15 2019, @02:59AM
I copy & paste the article titles. It's faster.
The only thing I ever add is a geek reference or a dad joke. I know, I shouldn't add the dad jokes; it's an illness.
Washington DC delenda est.