RT:
WhatsApp is threatening users who violate its rules with lawsuits, even if the only evidence of “rule-breaking” exists outside of the Facebook-owned messaging app and the only judge is an AI.
“WhatsApp will take legal action against those we determine are engaged in or assisting others in abuse… even if that determination is based on information solely available to us off our platform,” the company warned in an ominous FAQ entry posted on Monday.
The source is RT, but the FAQ linked in the excerpt does say that. Would we want Kellogg's surveilling us to make sure we're using their corn flakes properly?
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Saturday June 15 2019, @12:52AM (3 children)
The below are the first page of results from the google search:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22so+flawed+as+to+be+useless%22 [google.com]
Don't believe me? Do the search yourself.
Note that this is just the *first* page of results.
I'm sorry, what were you saying about my English?
https://www.commonwealmagazine.org/analogies-citations-photo-ops [commonwealmagazine.org]
http://tribecatrust.org/what-is-a-historic-district-and-why-have-one/ [tribecatrust.org]
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18412571 [goodreads.com]
https://www.economist.com/free-exchange/2011/06/20/banks-are-safe-say-banks [economist.com]
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=19/06/14/2049209 [soylentnews.org]
Text from the results below could not be copied as they are scans of books Check them out for yourself:
https://books.google.com/books?id=DBwrPX5MSMsC&pg=RA2-PT41&lpg=RA2-PT41&dq=%22so+flawed+as+to+be+useless%22&source=bl&ots=aa5d2cD9_1&sig=ACfU3U3NlW8WMH64gf-Rc-j3oG4w0gVXBQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiimdzhnuriAhUFxVkKHbHCDT4Q6AEwBHoECAcQAQ [google.com]
https://books.google.com/books?id=hjT9wwchiAIC&pg=PA55&lpg=PA55&dq=%22so+flawed+as+to+be+useless%22&source=bl&ots=OjiULnKR1j&sig=ACfU3U32m1yEsWlPf7c1N2B_trQzOhOTzg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiimdzhnuriAhUFxVkKHbHCDT4Q6AEwAnoECAgQAQ [google.com]
https://books.google.com/books?id=NSZjamv10AgC&pg=PT127&lpg=PT127&dq=%22so+flawed+as+to+be+useless%22&source=bl&ots=149mJd0W5_&sig=ACfU3U280tAiTh8KlvVfcudWdWtS9uEpZw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiimdzhnuriAhUFxVkKHbHCDT4Q6AEwBXoECAUQAQ [google.com]
https://books.google.com/books?id=j3gj33Z5pRAC&pg=PA145&lpg=PA145&dq=%22so+flawed+as+to+be+useless%22&source=bl&ots=_WtmpnBd3q&sig=ACfU3U1aFHYeUEs_A6KQsHvpFei6wygF9A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiimdzhnuriAhUFxVkKHbHCDT4Q6AEwBnoECAQQAQ [google.com]
https://books.google.com/books?id=cknMb_f-snMC&pg=PA550&lpg=PA550&dq=%22so+flawed+as+to+be+useless%22&source=bl&ots=cQGnQSGCnJ&sig=ACfU3U1WiFC6gCnaKdHvA29PGn1Dkb5H0Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiimdzhnuriAhUFxVkKHbHCDT4Q6AEwB3oECAMQAQ [google.com]
https://books.google.com/books?id=dNUsAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA550&lpg=PA550&ots=3J2B2jrJuf&focus=viewport&dq=%22so+flawed+as+to+be+useless%22 [google.com]
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 15 2019, @03:36AM (2 children)
AC was mocking the OP's English. And now I am mocking your awareness. Whoosh
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Saturday June 15 2019, @04:44AM
I'm working on almost 40 hours without sleep. But even so, I eventually got there [soylentnews.org]
Although I'm not sure why other AC thought I'd catch it right away (I just figured he was ESL and didn't recognize the phrase), when I didn't catch it the several times I previewed it before posting.
In any case, I hope you enjoyed yourself. I hope the fact that I feel no embarrassment at all doesn't take any of that enjoyment away.
My apologies if it did.
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Saturday June 15 2019, @04:46AM
Heck, I just modded *both* you up too. I guess today is your lucky day!
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr