Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Friday June 14 2019, @10:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the data-sharing-policies dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Opinion | We Read 150 Privacy Policies. They Were an Incomprehensible Disaster.

[...] here are several privacy policies from major tech and media platforms. Like most privacy policies, they’re verbose and full of legal jargon — and opaquely establish companies’ justifications for collecting and selling your data. The data market has become the engine of the internet, and these privacy policies we agree to but don't fully understand help fuel it.

To see exactly how inscrutable they have become, I analyzed the length and readability of privacy policies from nearly 150 popular websites and apps. Facebook’s privacy policy, for example, takes around 18 minutes to read in its entirety – slightly above average for the policies I tested.

Then I tested how easy it was to understand each policy using the Lexile test developed by the education company Metametrics. The test measures a text’s complexity based on factors like sentence length and the difficulty of vocabulary.

[...] The vast majority of these privacy policies exceed the college reading level. And according to the most recent literacy survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics, over half of Americans may struggle to comprehend dense, lengthy texts. That means a significant chunk of the data collection economy is based on consenting to complicated documents that many Americans can’t understand.

[...] Despite efforts like the General Data Protection Regulation to make policies more accessible, there seems to be an intractable tradeoff between a policy’s readability and length. Even policies that are shorter and easier to read can be impenetrable, given the amount of background knowledge required to understand how things like cookies and IP addresses play a role in data collection.

“You’re confused into thinking these are there to inform users, as opposed to protect companies,” said Albert Gidari, the consulting director of privacy at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Friday June 14 2019, @10:35PM (1 child)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Friday June 14 2019, @10:35PM (#855788) Journal

    Anything you say can and will be used against you, and you ain't gettin' no lawyer!

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Saturday June 15 2019, @02:26AM

    by RS3 (6367) on Saturday June 15 2019, @02:26AM (#855865)

    I've read many "privacy" policies. I can only remember one that basically said "we value your privacy and will never share your data with anyone without your express written approval".

    The rest of them say: "We value your privacy. ... blah blah blah words babble ... We will share your data with our trusted partners." Which means anyone we want.

    "We value your privacy. Er, what we mean is your perception of privacy has value to us. And value = $. So just you go ahead and trust us and give us your personal info and let us turn it into our stockholders' value."