SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for Bytram
Opinion | We Read 150 Privacy Policies. They Were an Incomprehensible Disaster.
[...] here are several privacy policies from major tech and media platforms. Like most privacy policies, they’re verbose and full of legal jargon — and opaquely establish companies’ justifications for collecting and selling your data. The data market has become the engine of the internet, and these privacy policies we agree to but don't fully understand help fuel it.
To see exactly how inscrutable they have become, I analyzed the length and readability of privacy policies from nearly 150 popular websites and apps. Facebook’s privacy policy, for example, takes around 18 minutes to read in its entirety – slightly above average for the policies I tested.
Then I tested how easy it was to understand each policy using the Lexile test developed by the education company Metametrics. The test measures a text’s complexity based on factors like sentence length and the difficulty of vocabulary.
[...] The vast majority of these privacy policies exceed the college reading level. And according to the most recent literacy survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics, over half of Americans may struggle to comprehend dense, lengthy texts. That means a significant chunk of the data collection economy is based on consenting to complicated documents that many Americans can’t understand.
[...] Despite efforts like the General Data Protection Regulation to make policies more accessible, there seems to be an intractable tradeoff between a policy’s readability and length. Even policies that are shorter and easier to read can be impenetrable, given the amount of background knowledge required to understand how things like cookies and IP addresses play a role in data collection.
“You’re confused into thinking these are there to inform users, as opposed to protect companies,” said Albert Gidari, the consulting director of privacy at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society.
(Score: 2) by Thexalon on Saturday June 15 2019, @01:02PM
Back in 2009, then-professor Elizabeth Warren did an interview where she outlined how she, a professor of contract law at Harvard Law School, couldn't make heads or tails of her own credit card contract. Neither could her colleagues at Harvard Law. Neither could anybody the Government Accountability Office.
Pretty much all these contracts amount to: "We can do whatever we want, and you can't stop us. Nya, nya, nya nya nya." That's it. And good luck getting cell phone service, Internet access, a bank account, electric power, or all sorts of other basics of modern life without signing one.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.