Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by chromas on Friday June 14 2019, @10:25PM   Printer-friendly
from the data-sharing-policies dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Opinion | We Read 150 Privacy Policies. They Were an Incomprehensible Disaster.

[...] here are several privacy policies from major tech and media platforms. Like most privacy policies, they’re verbose and full of legal jargon — and opaquely establish companies’ justifications for collecting and selling your data. The data market has become the engine of the internet, and these privacy policies we agree to but don't fully understand help fuel it.

To see exactly how inscrutable they have become, I analyzed the length and readability of privacy policies from nearly 150 popular websites and apps. Facebook’s privacy policy, for example, takes around 18 minutes to read in its entirety – slightly above average for the policies I tested.

Then I tested how easy it was to understand each policy using the Lexile test developed by the education company Metametrics. The test measures a text’s complexity based on factors like sentence length and the difficulty of vocabulary.

[...] The vast majority of these privacy policies exceed the college reading level. And according to the most recent literacy survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics, over half of Americans may struggle to comprehend dense, lengthy texts. That means a significant chunk of the data collection economy is based on consenting to complicated documents that many Americans can’t understand.

[...] Despite efforts like the General Data Protection Regulation to make policies more accessible, there seems to be an intractable tradeoff between a policy’s readability and length. Even policies that are shorter and easier to read can be impenetrable, given the amount of background knowledge required to understand how things like cookies and IP addresses play a role in data collection.

“You’re confused into thinking these are there to inform users, as opposed to protect companies,” said Albert Gidari, the consulting director of privacy at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday June 15 2019, @04:23PM (2 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday June 15 2019, @04:23PM (#856017) Journal

    Uh, yeah, you have to understand the basics before more complex things can be explained to you.

    One of the first things that should be coming to your mind is why does humanity need rules so complex that even the people writing them have trouble understanding what they mean? Obfuscation is a big reason why.

  • (Score: 2) by darkfeline on Sunday June 16 2019, @04:12AM (1 child)

    by darkfeline (1030) on Sunday June 16 2019, @04:12AM (#856153) Homepage

    Yes, cookies and IP addresses are all a big conspiracy to make it hard to understand technology. Complex things are complex.

    And yes, that includes legal literature. It turns out simple rules don't work because reality is complicated. More and more exceptions get added over time, and here we are.

    --
    Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday June 17 2019, @03:34AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 17 2019, @03:34AM (#856482) Journal

      Yes, cookies and IP addresses are all a big conspiracy to make it hard to understand technology.

      You don't need to "exceed the college reading level" in order to explain cookies and IP addresses.