Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday June 19 2019, @08:56AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-so-perma-frost dept.

Scientists Amazed as Canadian Permafrost Thaws 70 Years Early:

Permafrost at outposts in the Canadian Arctic is thawing 70 years earlier than predicted, an expedition has discovered, in the latest sign that the global climate crisis is accelerating even faster than scientists had feared.

[...] With governments meeting in Bonn this week to try to ratchet up ambitions in United Nations climate negotiations, the... findings, published on June 10 in Geophysical Research Letters, offered a further sign of a growing climate emergency.

The paper was based on data Romanovsky and his colleagues had been analyzing since their last expedition to the area in 2016. The team used a modified propeller plane to visit exceptionally remote sites, including an abandoned Cold War-era radar base more than 300 km from the nearest human settlement.

Diving through a lucky break in the clouds, Romanovsky and his colleagues said they were confronted with a landscape that was unrecognizable from the pristine Arctic terrain they had encountered during initial visits a decade or so earlier.

The vista had dissolved into an undulating sea of hummocks - waist-high depressions and ponds known as thermokarst. Vegetation, once sparse, had begun to flourish in the shelter provided from the constant wind.

[...] Scientists are concerned about the stability of permafrost because of the risk that rapid thawing could release vast quantities of heat-trapping gases, unleashing a feedback loop that would in turn fuel even faster temperature rises.

No word on whether or not the Wicked Witch of the West had anything to do with it.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JNCF on Wednesday June 19 2019, @06:16PM (3 children)

    by JNCF (4317) on Wednesday June 19 2019, @06:16PM (#857550) Journal

    Maybe try the "disagree" mod next time, or come up with a valid response? Idiot != troll, a troll can be an idiot or wise man; Socrates is perhaps the most famous of all trolls. I'm not convinced that GGGP was arguing a point they didn't believe (though FTR, I don't believe their point).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 19 2019, @08:06PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 19 2019, @08:06PM (#857587)

    Perhaps you're right, and he's just a moron and not a troll. but as I pointed out [soylentnews.org]:

    '-1 troll' will do just fine as a stand in for '-1 moron'.

    I stand by that statement.

  • (Score: 2) by quietus on Wednesday June 19 2019, @08:32PM

    by quietus (6328) on Wednesday June 19 2019, @08:32PM (#857595) Journal

    It's a long time since I read Hippias Minor and Hippias Major, but my impression of Socrates was more like a ridiculizer of trolls. In which I define a troll as somebody who's overly convinced of his own superiority, like all of these climate change deniers tend to be: look Ma, I'm so much more smarter than that worldwide conspiracy of idiots who call themselves scientists.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 20 2019, @02:18AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 20 2019, @02:18AM (#857717)

    How about "-1 intellectually dishonest" and "-1 flawed logic" ?

    There are smart, intellectually dishonest trolls; these are good for honing our argumentation on.

    There are smart, nontrolls, who have flawed logic. I don't want to call them an idiot (not every time) but I do want to let them know their "A->B, and C, therefore D" doesn't hold.