A Florida city's council voted to pay a ransom of $600,000 in Bitcoin to hackers that targeted its computer systems — and the payout is a sign of how unprepared much of the US is to deal with a coming wave of cyber attacks.
The city council of Riviera Beach, 50 miles north of Fort Lauderdale, voted on Monday to meet the demands of their hackers in the hope of getting back their compromised data, CBS News reported.
According to The Palm Beach Post, the attack began on May 29, when a employee from the police department opened an email attachment that contained malware. The software quickly spread through the city's computer systems, affecting its email system and even the 911 dispatch operations.
The New York Times reported that the hackers demanded their ransom in bitcoin. The paper noted that there is no guarantee that hackers will honor their end of the deal after getting the money. CBS reported that the council already voted to spend $1 million on new computers after the attack.
Also at CNN.
Related: In Baltimore And Beyond, A Stolen NSA Tool Wreaks Havoc
(Score: 3, Informative) by takyon on Thursday June 20 2019, @06:52PM (1 child)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_negotiation_with_terrorists#United_States [wikipedia.org]
It's an informal policy. And refers to hostages rather than servers.
As for coming down hard on families who pay money to designated terrorist organizations, it may be technically illegal but it isn't enforced:
https://warontherocks.com/2019/02/no-concessions-a-closer-look-at-u-s-hostage-recovery-policy/ [warontherocks.com]
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 20 2019, @08:33PM
That was the case I was thinking of, thank you for finding that quote. Getting a visit or a phone call from a government official who tells you about the possibility of a 30 year stretch for charges like money laundering, providing material support to terrorists etc. is coming down pretty hard in my book, even if it never has gone to court because that's just too much risk in exchange to get your fool of a son back.