Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday June 24 2019, @01:33AM   Printer-friendly
from the meat-brains-need-not-apply dept.

AP-NORC poll: Asteroid watch more urgent than Mars trip

Americans prefer a space program that focuses on potential asteroid impacts, scientific research and using robots to explore the cosmos over sending humans back to the moon or on to Mars, a poll shows.

The poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, released Thursday, one month before the 50th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing, lists asteroid and comet monitoring as the No. 1 desired objective for the U.S. space program. About two-thirds of Americans call that very or extremely important, and about a combined 9 in 10 say it's at least moderately important.

The poll comes as the White House pushes to get astronauts back on the moon, but only about a quarter of Americans said moon or Mars exploration by astronauts should be among the space program's highest priorities. About another third called each of those moderately important.

"More than 80% say the United States is not leading the world in space exploration."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday June 24 2019, @03:17AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 24 2019, @03:17AM (#859232) Journal

    See, we're opposed in our attitude toward space, right there.

    Need a more precise definition for "we".
    'Cause for different values of the "we" parameter, the value of "attitude" function varies wildly.

    Promise everyone 40 million acres and a mule, two chickens in every pot, and free healthcare. Whatever it takes to get people moving *out there*

    For the moment, the humanity can't afford to "Promise everyone ... get people moving *out there*"

    You see, it's a matter of controllable energy available in enough amount (to get the hell out from the gravitational well) and high enough density (to limit the dead-payload for the transport).
    In other words, we need more powerful but still controllable bombs. Which, you see, is The problem: looking into the human history, one can bet the moment those become available, their first use will be as weapons or in building weapon platforms.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2