Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by chromas on Wednesday July 03 2019, @12:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the I'll-just-leave-this-here dept.

Hard-to-kill poop parasites that lurk in swimming pools on the rise, CDC warns

Outbreaks of the gastrointestinal parasite cryptosporidium have been spurting upward since 2009, with the number of outbreaks gushing up an average of 13% each year, according to researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The germ spreads via the fecal-oral route and causes explosive, watery diarrhea that can last for up to three weeks. Most victims pick up the infection from recreational waters, such as swimming pools and water parks.

The main trouble is that crypto is extremely tolerant of chlorine and can happily stay afloat in well-treated pools for more than seven days. Thus, sick swimmers are the main source of infection—often young children who have yet to master toilet skills and also have more of a tendency to gulp pool water. An infected person can shed 100 million parasite eggs in one bout of diarrhea. Knocking back just 10 or fewer eggs in contaminated pool water can lead to an infection.

A 2013 study released by the CDC found that 58% of tested pools were positive for bacteria typically present in fecal matter.

[...] In all, the CDC recorded 444 outbreaks, involving 7,465 cases, 287 hospitalizations, and one death from the parasite. The number of cases per outbreak ranged from two to 638. However, the CDC notes that the figures likely underestimate the number of outbreaks and cases given that not every state reliably reports outbreaks and many people don't report their illnesses.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 03 2019, @02:35PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 03 2019, @02:35PM (#862726)

    Look at Lisa Su, who planned the current wave of new cpus 5 years ago.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Wednesday July 03 2019, @03:51PM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday July 03 2019, @03:51PM (#862760) Journal
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 03 2019, @06:25PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 03 2019, @06:25PM (#862836)

      In 2016 [...] Keller said that using nanowires and stacking his team had mapped a path to packing transistors 50 times more densely than possible with Intel's 10 nanometer generation of technology. "That's basically already working," he said.

      So what happened the last 3 years to that 10 nm? Personally I think all signs point to that Intel has developed some deep institutional problems and a couple engineering geniuses won't be able to save them.

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Wednesday July 03 2019, @06:37PM

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Wednesday July 03 2019, @06:37PM (#862841) Journal

        That may be the case. But:

        1. Semiconductor fabrication is hard. If they had outsourced it like AMD did, they would have been able to contract with GlobalFoundries, TSMC, or Samsung. GloFo fucked up and quit the race, while the other two have been able to stay at the bleeding edge.

        2. No EUV. ASML has delayed EUV for years, which has made it difficult to push through onto the smaller nodes.

        3. The 14nm++++++++++++++ node is comparable to the other guy's "10nm". So they are only starting to really fall behind now that they have to compete with "7nm" with their own "10nm" that is not as well optimized as their ultra-mature "14nm" and has bad yields. They are late to move to chiplet-based design which could have helped them to cope with yield issues.

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]