Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday July 06 2019, @07:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the Catch^W-find-me-if-you-can dept.

NASA won't launch a mission to hunt deadly asteroids:

NASA says it can't afford to build a space telescope considered the fastest way to identify asteroids that might impact the Earth with terrible consequences.

A 2015 law gave the space agency five years to identify 90% of near-Earth objects larger than 140 meters in diameter, which could devastate cities, regions and even civilization itself if they were to impact the planet. NASA isn't going to meet that deadline, and scientists believe they have so far only identified about a third of the asteroids considered a threat.

Researchers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, led by principal investigator Amy Mainzer, developed a proposal for a space telescope called NEOCam that would use infrared sensors to find and measure near-Earth objects. The National Academy of Sciences issued a report this spring concluding that NEOCam was the fastest way to meet the asteroid-hunting mandate. But NASA will not approve the project to begin development. "The Planetary Defense Program at NASA does not currently have sufficient funding to approve development of a full space-based NEO survey mission as was proposed by the NEOCam project," a NASA spokesperson told Quartz this week.

The agency said it was prioritizing funding for ground-based telescopes looking for asteroids, though the NAS report concluded that they would not fulfill its mandate. The agency is also funding the Double Asteroid Redirection Test mission (DART), which will pilot the technologies needed to do something about any threatening near-Earth objects. Still, the agency said the infrared telescope proposed for NEOCam "could be ready for any future flight mission development effort."

Near-Earth Object Camera (NEOCam).

See also: Poll: Americans Want NASA To Focus More On Asteroid Impacts, Less On Getting To Mars

Related: Nathan Myhrvold Challenges NASA's NEOWISE Asteroid Results With Peer-Reviewed Paper
SpaceX Drops Protest of "Lucy" Contract, Gets Double Asteroid Redirection Test Contract
Americans Polled on Attitudes Toward the Space Program


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Bot on Saturday July 06 2019, @11:10AM (1 child)

    by Bot (3902) on Saturday July 06 2019, @11:10AM (#863786) Journal

    NEVER use public money for useful projects.
    First waste it on grandiose but irrelevant stuff, then mount a media campaign for the useful project, then crowdfund/extort to the state the additional funding.

    Also make sure whatever project gets 90% finished before abandoning it.

    The ultimate aim is to DDoS the people by wasting their money so they need to work more, not to get rich yourself.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 06 2019, @02:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 06 2019, @02:48PM (#863821)

    Whatever the government reports about its own budget cannot be trusted. They are free to move around expenses from like a nuclear test and put it under a different name as part of Medicare or NASA, or even remove the expense of the test completely from the budget:
    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/secret-government-spending-779959/#! [rollingstone.com]

    People want to give this organization more money?