Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday July 06 2019, @05:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the spoonful-of-relativity dept.

[Ed. note: This article was recently published (July 6, 2019) on the Science Alert web site. As a footnote on the Science Alert story notes: "This article was originally published at Aeon and has been republished under Creative Commons." Viewing the source HTML at Aeon, I discovered it was originally published 02-Feb-2018. Though the material is somewhat dated, it was the first I'd heard of this and thought it sufficiently interesting to share with the SoylentNews community. --martyb]

Entanglement of particles, i.e. quantum nonlocality, is routinely demonstrated in particles separated by space.

But space and time are related, leading to a team of physicists demonstrating that quantum entanglement can occur across time with particles that shared no concurrent existence.

Just when you thought quantum mechanics couldn't get any weirder, a team of physicists at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem reported in 2013 that they had successfully entangled photons that never coexisted.

Previous experiments involving a technique called 'entanglement swapping' had already showed quantum correlations across time, by delaying the measurement of one of the coexisting entangled particles; but Eli Megidish and his collaborators were the first to show entanglement between photons whose lifespans did not overlap at all.

One might be curious how a measurement done on one particle might be instantly reflected on another that doesn't exist yet, so here is how this was accomplished:

First, they created an entangled pair of photons, '1-2' (step I in the diagram below). Soon after, they measured the polarisation of photon 1 (a property describing the direction of light's oscillation) – thus 'killing' it (step II).

Photon 2 was sent on a wild goose chase while a new entangled pair, '3-4', was created (step III). Photon 3 was then measured along with the itinerant photon 2 in such a way that the entanglement relation was 'swapped' from the old pairs ('1-2' and '3-4') onto the new '2-3' combo (step IV).

Some time later (step V), the polarisation of the lone survivor, photon 4, is measured, and the results are compared with those of the long-dead photon 1 (back at step II).

The upshot? The data revealed the existence of quantum correlations between 'temporally nonlocal' photons 1 and 4. That is, entanglement can occur across two quantum systems that never coexisted.

The physicist's speculation on what this means is somewhat reminiscent of a cat in a box:

Perhaps the measurement of photon 1's polarisation at step II somehow steers the future polarisation of 4, or the measurement of photon 4's polarisation at step V somehow rewrites the past polarisation state of photon 1.

For this to begin to make sense, recall that simultaneity is not the absolute Newtonian property you perceive, but per Einstein

a relative one. There is no single timekeeper for the Universe; precisely when something is occurring depends on your precise location relative to what you are observing, known as your frame of reference.

So the key to avoiding strange causal behaviour (steering the future or rewriting the past) in instances of temporal separation is to accept that calling events 'simultaneous' carries little metaphysical weight.

It is only a frame-specific property, a choice among many alternative but equally viable ones – a matter of convention, or record-keeping.

The lesson carries over directly to both spatial and temporal quantum nonlocality.

Hopefully the temporal entanglement of entire objects is next. Imagine checking out the final episode of a show on your entangled TV, realizing it is terrible, and avoiding the entire series which the studios don't even make because nobody watched it...

Journal Reference
E. Megidish, et al. Entanglement Swapping between Photons that have Never Coexisted Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 210403 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.210403


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday July 06 2019, @07:06PM (3 children)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday July 06 2019, @07:06PM (#863911) Journal

    From now on when I see a "duplicate" article, I'll just assume it was time displaced entanglement.

    And let's not forget the great words of George Washington:

    for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements.

    Stolen from Eisenhower...

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Saturday July 06 2019, @07:13PM

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Saturday July 06 2019, @07:13PM (#863914) Journal

    Sorry, I was referring to this, caution against entangling alliances [wikimedia.org]

    A movement is afoot.

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 2) by captain normal on Saturday July 06 2019, @08:45PM (1 child)

    by captain normal (2205) on Saturday July 06 2019, @08:45PM (#863932)

    Even regarding your next (entangled) post, the Orange POTUS could very well use that sentience...if he could understand it.

    --
    When life isn't going right, go left.
    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Sunday July 07 2019, @12:00AM

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 07 2019, @12:00AM (#863976) Journal

      the Orange POTUS could very well use that sentience...if he could understand it.

      The humanity is past the age in which the use of something requires prior understanding (if there ever was such an age).

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford