Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday July 13 2019, @05:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the bluffing-bots dept.

Facebook and CMU's poker AI beat five pros at once (archive)

Facebook and Carnegie Mellon University have built another artificial intelligence bot that beat some top poker pros. While AI bots have been [able] to best professional players in one-on-one competition, Facebook claims it's the first time a bot has been able to beat top pros in "any major benchmark game" when there's more than one opponent at a time. Pluribus bested professionals in no-limit Texas Hold'em in a couple of different formats: five AI bots and one human, and one bot and five real-life players. The researchers behind Pluribus wrote in a paper published in Science that creating such a multiplayer poker bot "is a recognized AI milestone."

In the likes of chess and Go, everything is laid out in the open. But in poker, there's hidden information, namely the cards your opponents have. That brings different, complex strategies to poker not seen in other games, including bluffing. As such, AI bots have typically struggled to account for hidden information and effectively act on it.

Bluffing poses a particularly interesting challenge. A successful bluff can dramatically change a poker game in your favor, but do it too much and your deception becomes predictable. So the bot has to balance bluffing with betting on legitimately strong hands.

Also at BBC, The Verge, Ars Technica, and Facebook.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday July 13 2019, @08:16AM (1 child)

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Saturday July 13 2019, @08:16AM (#866528) Homepage
    The "the computer may know the maths, but can't top the human element" bubble is finally burst, and good riddance to it. The only reason some humans dominate in poker is because other humans are more flawed. Sorry, the train is faster than the horse, deal with it.

    Yes, I was super-happy when AlphaGo beat Lee Sedol too; the self-inflated bullshit that the chattering go crowd kept spewing out when they were comparing their magical mystical game to crappy old chess was insufferable. (No disrespect to the top go players themselves, they never did the chattering, they let their playing do all the talking, but you know the types I'm talking about, the ones who pump the thing they're associated with as being somehow special, and thus we are expected to conclude that they too must somehow also be special by dint of their connection with it.)
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Saturday July 13 2019, @01:01PM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday July 13 2019, @01:01PM (#866586) Journal

    Human competition could be done for.

    Chess and Go players can cheat with the help of advanced software. Hidden earpiece today, contact lens display 10 years from now, brain implants 50 years from now.

    On the athletics front, biotechnology will allow new heights of cheating, as well as designer athlete babies, etc. Blood doping, testosterone, and blade legs will look quaint.

    As for poker, maybe some further tiny gains can be made if the AI is able to watch the body language of human players. Maybe not very practical, but it's not like Facebook is funding poker research because of poker.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]