Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday July 17 2019, @03:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the It-is-SO-GOOD-"they"-are-afraid-to-let-us-tell-you-about-it! dept.

Submitted via IRC for AnonymousLuser

Peddlers of Medical Misinformation Are Using Social Media 'Censorship' as a Selling Point

Speech OnlineSpeech OnlineThis week, we're looking at the state of free speech on the internet, how we got here, and where we're going.  

No one has ever accused Mike Adams, the self-proclaimed Health Ranger, of being an understated guy, but recent events have taken him to new, shouty heights. After Adams' website, Natural News, had its page suspended by Facebook in June for violating the company's spam policies, Adams likened the suspension to genocide and said President Trump should use the military, if necessary, to break up tech companies. But Adams—and other peddlers of medical misinformation, including many anti-vaccine personalities—are also working hard to make their supposed muzzling by social media companies into a selling point and a profit-driver.

In an email blast on June 30, Adams accused Google of gaming search results to "to defame and attack all natural health topics, all while banning natural health websites from its search results." He added that the search engine giant "has gone all-in with Monsanto, Big Pharma, chemotherapy, pesticides, 5G, geoengineering, fluoride and every other poison you can imagine."

And then, naturally, he turned around and offered to sell his audience the supplements So Powerful That Google Is Trying to Hide Them (emphasis his):

P.S. Despite Google's malicious attacks on health and nutrition, the truth is that nutritional supplements works. For the next day or so, we've got an event running on PQQ, CoQ10 and other specialty supplements that dramatically increase your intake of cell-supporting nutrients (including brain-supporting nutrients). Check out the details here.

It is emblematic of the strange moment we've arrived at in the selling of misinformation online, particularly the medical variety. In recent months, several social media giants have announced their intention to crack down on that misinformation, including most particularly anti-vaccine content. (Pinterest made the "vaccine" hashtag literally impossible to search for since virtually every search resultshowed up anti-vax content.)

But the process has been late, slow, and inconsistent. Take Instagram, which banned some anti-vaccine hashtags in March, but left others alone. Today, some of those banned hashtags, like #vaccineskill, have made a noticeable comeback, and there are anti-vaccine accounts aplenty, including Vaccine Truth,which has 60,000 followers. Or take the lively world of fake cancer cures: theWall Street Journalrecently noted that YouTube and Facebook are still overrun with the same fake cancer treatments that have been circulating online for years. That includes black salve, a longtime faux treatment for skin cancer that in actuality just burns skin away without killing cancer growths, and the entire opus of Robert O. Young, who promotes things like juicing regimens and "alkaline infusions" to cure cancer, infusions that critics say are functionally just injections of a baking soda cocktail. Young went to prison in 2017 for practicing medicine without a license, and he was ordered to pay over $100 million in a civil lawsuit filed against him by a terminal cancer patient who'd used his treatments the following year. Yet he's back on Facebook and busily selling his products through a network of interconnected pages.

In other words, the social media companies' supposed "crackdown" has been bizarre, partial, and in some cases, not permanent. The entire muddled process has certainly complicated business for people who make a living selling misinformation. But it's also given them a recognizable new selling point, a way to claim to the audience they still very much have on these same social media platforms that their ideas simply must work, which is why Big Government and Big Pharma are trying to muzzle them.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 17 2019, @06:05PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 17 2019, @06:05PM (#868126)

    I just don't understand why some people who are otherwise on the left suddenly become hardcore free marketeers when it comes to corporations censoring people on near-monopolistic platforms, when in almost every other instance they profess skepticism of corporations. These corporations are not your friends, and they are not just censoring right-wing people (despite right-wingers pretending that that is so). Youtube, for example, is screwing over nearly all forms of independent media, including the likes of Kyle Kulinski and David Pakman, who are obviously not right-wing. The only saving grace so far is that independent media hasn't been outright censored on the platform in general, but what it does show (yet again) is that corporations are not on the side of ordinary people and value money above all else. They don't care if you're left-wing or not, so stop with the free market extremism on this matter and wake up to the fact that when giant platforms like Google, Youtube, and Facebook use censorship or biased algorithms to promote propaganda news outlets, it has negative externalities on the rest of society.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 17 2019, @07:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 17 2019, @07:37PM (#868177)

    They are authoritarians.

  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday July 17 2019, @10:24PM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 17 2019, @10:24PM (#868245) Journal

    I just don't understand why some people who are otherwise on the left suddenly become hardcore free marketeers when it comes to corporations censoring people on near-monopolistic platforms

    Because their rights are your rights too. If the state can force them to do things contrary to their private interest, the state can force you too.
    Careful what you wish for.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford