Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday July 18 2019, @06:19AM   Printer-friendly
from the RIP dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Justice John Paul Stevens, dead at 99, promoted the Internet revolution

Former Supreme Court justice John Paul Stevens died Tuesday at the age of 99. During Stevens' tenure on the high court, which stretched from 1975 to 2010, Stevens had a huge impact on legal issues affecting the technology sector. Tonight we're republishing a lightly edited version of our 2010 story that originally marked his retirement from the Supreme Court.

In April 2010, the Supreme Court's most senior justice, John Paul Stevens, announced his retirement. In the weeks that followed, hundreds of articles were written about his career and his legacy. While most articles focus on "hot button" issues such as flag burning, terrorism, and affirmative action, Stevens' tech policy record has largely been ignored.

When Justice Stevens joined the court, many of the technologies we now take for granted—the PC, packet-switched networks, home video recording—were in their infancy. During his 35-year tenure on the bench, Stevens penned decisions that laid the foundation for the tremendous innovations that followed in each of these areas.

For example, Stevens penned the 1978 decision that shielded the software industry from the patent system in its formative years. In 1984, Hollywood's effort to ban the VCR failed by just one Supreme Court vote; Stevens wrote the majority opinion. And in 1997, he wrote the majority opinion striking down the worst provisions of the Communications Decency Act and ensuring that the Internet would have robust First Amendment protections.

Indeed, Justice Stevens probably deserves more credit than any other justice for the innovations that occurred under his watch. And given how central those technologies have become to the American economy, Stevens' tech policy work may prove one of his most enduring legacies. In this feature, we review Justice Stevens' tech policy decisions and salute the justice who helped make possible DRM-free media devices, uncensored Internet connections, free software, and much more.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by jmichaelhudsondotnet on Thursday July 18 2019, @09:54PM

    by jmichaelhudsondotnet (8122) on Thursday July 18 2019, @09:54PM (#868704) Journal

    I love him.

    He is one of any rational american person's great anchors to reality and a giant arrow pointing to an entirely different and better type of society.

    A politico(blah) essay on his book and his last suggestions, in 2014, in his 90's, with 0 (you know what's) left to give, gave clear, rational, sort of obvious instructions on how our society could be better improved. Constitutional amendmens considered impossible, but I am trying to understand why.

    Essentially 24 hour corporate news and surveillance capitalism are a way to prevent those things from ever happening, this tiger has shown its stripes.

    You should think long and hard about this.

    There is a global heat wave, there is the worst ebola outbreak ever still uncontained and facebook is a cult. (arrest zuckerberg)

    This is has been a public service announcement from rationality central, but that's something I just made up and I'm drinking wine.

    If he can be that great, so can you. We need millions of guys and people of all genders and orientations and even intergalactic aliens like him.

    Get to it. Don't leave those of us hanging who have our necks out against these madmen.

    I love John Paul Stevens.