Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday July 19 2019, @07:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the How-well-does-it-work-on-humans? dept.

Researchers at the Center for Geospatial Analytics at North Carolina State University recently developed a new forecasting technology [...] called PoPS, the Pest or Pathogen Spread forecast, a sophisticated yet user-friendly tool that can be used to predict the spread of potentially any species.

Computer models are the go-to method for predicting the spread of insect pests and the pathogens that cause plant disease. Running these models typically requires a lot of data––gigabytes and gigabytes of data––and being fluent in the language of computer code. Assorted software is also usually needed, and so is a familiarity with the ins and outs of model calibration and validation: that is, making sure that a model is well-matched to the data feeding it and checking that the model is doing a good job of predicting what it's supposed to.

For managers who need answers quickly, without being expert coders, the task can be daunting. Under most circumstances, preparing the data and models to simulate a pest's spread can take months to a year. Enter PoPS, a nearly fully automated framework that asks its users for a few simple inputs to output spread predictions and comparisons of management scenarios.

With PoPS, managers simply provide three years' worth of infestation information and adjust a few values on the web-based dashboard to answer pressing questions about when, where and how much a pest problem is likely to grow, and how much it may cost to stop it.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Friday July 19 2019, @09:05AM

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Friday July 19 2019, @09:05AM (#868889)

    TFS doesn't say if the tool gives the right answer.

    > making sure that a model is well-matched to the data feeding it

    Why would anyone want to do that?

    > For managers who need answers quickly, without being expert coders

    "Data analyst" is very different to "coder". A "data analyst" may write code to support their analysis.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2