Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday July 19 2019, @03:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the meeting-expectations dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Atlassian ditches 'brilliant jerks' in performance review overhaul

Atlassian says it will no longer tolerate "brilliant jerks" who deliver results for the company but make life hell for their co-workers as part of a complete overhaul of how the tech firm conducts performance reviews.

The $47 billion Australian software company, which was founded in Sydney in 2002 and floated on the US stock market in 2015, says two-thirds of every performance review will now have nothing to do with job skills.

Instead, equal weighting will be given to how each of its 3000 employees impacts others on their team, and to how they live the company values. Atlassian says the change will “more fairly measure people on how they bring their whole self to work”.

“Basically over the last 18 to 24 months we have totally changed the way we do performance reviews at the company globally,” Atlassian global head of talent Bek Chee said.

“We recognise things are not the way they used to be, yet companies haven’t evolved (from) 30 years ago when they were primarily made up often of white men. Tech standards have evolved, we have new ways of working, new demographics and generational change.”

Ms Chee said most companies “haven’t looked at their performance systems in a new innovative way”. “We wanted to make sure we were rewarding the right behaviours,” she said.

“One of the things we wanted to make sure we accounted for was the ‘brilliant jerk’ — people who are extremely bright and talented with respect to the way they execute their role but aren’t necessarily concerned with the impact they have on others. We want to make sure our system prevented that.”

Ms Chee said it was “not about people being shuffled out” of the company, but “what it has allowed us to do is really de-bias the performance system” by taking into account an employee’s entire contribution.

[...] Ms Chee said appealing to the millennial and gen Y and Z crowd was “a huge part of this”. “We know the next generation are very socially conscious, they have a different set of expectations. They’re kind of no-bullshit. They don’t want to hear a company say, ‘You can bring your whole self to work, we’re diverse, we’re socially conscious’, and not have that backed up.”

But she stressed that it was not about coddling millennials with a participation-trophy mentality. “Fundamentally this does not change the way we think about high performers. Our top performers we know nail it in terms of living values and being part of the team and delivering in their role,” she said.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by ElizabethGreene on Friday July 19 2019, @10:45PM (2 children)

    by ElizabethGreene (6748) Subscriber Badge on Friday July 19 2019, @10:45PM (#869191) Journal

    I don't (and can't) know if I was hired for my position because of my gender or my competence and it drives me nucking futs.

    I have enough issues with imposter syndrome already, I really don't need the extra help.

    :/

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Overrated=1, Touché=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Coward, Anonymous on Saturday July 20 2019, @05:07AM

    by Coward, Anonymous (7017) on Saturday July 20 2019, @05:07AM (#869288) Journal

    Ah well, once you're hired its water under the bridge. The present and future are the only things that matter.

  • (Score: 2) by bradley13 on Saturday July 20 2019, @07:01AM

    by bradley13 (3053) on Saturday July 20 2019, @07:01AM (#869314) Homepage Journal

    My wife has made similar comments. She's one of the smartest people I know, and damned good both in IT and in other fields. The very idea that she might have been selected for something because of her gender - she finds that offensive. So I get where you're coming from.

    This is where well-meaning people have really damaged equal rights: By creating "diversity hires", competent women have to prove - over and over again - that they are in fact competent.

    That said, the other reply to your comment is right: You were selected, and it no longer matters why. Look forward to the future. Damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead :-)

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.