Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by FatPhil on Sunday July 21 2019, @06:44PM   Printer-friendly
from the Big-Brother-Is-Listening dept.

Google has confirmed that audit snippets are sent to humans to listen to which includes background noises following an investigation about Dutch audio data that had been leaked.

Google said this work helps with developing voice recognition and other technology in its Google Assistant artificial intelligence system, which is used in its Google Home smart speakers and Android smartphones.

[...] Approximately 0.2 per cent of all audio snippets are reviewed by "language experts". Google's response to the leak of private user data is to review their safeguards to prevent future misconduct.

We just learned that one of these reviewers has violated our data security policies by leaking confidential Dutch audio data. [...]

Belgium's VRT NWS also report: Google employees are eavesdropping, even in your living room, VRT NWS has discovered.

Google employees are systematically listening to audio files recorded by Google Home smart speakers and the Google Assistant smartphone app. Throughout the world – so also in Belgium and the Netherlands – people at Google listen to these audio files to improve Google's search engine. VRT NWS was able to listen to more than a thousand recordings. Most of these recordings were made consciously, but Google also listens to conversations that should never have been recorded, some of which contain sensitive information.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 22 2019, @12:03AM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 22 2019, @12:03AM (#869773) Journal

    There's only a handful of rational reactions to this very old news:

    1. You are against "smart" devices at a philosophical level. Which is fine, but there's nothing to discuss in that case.
    2. Google et al are at fault for keeping the recordings (but how are they supposed to improve their AI?).
    3. Google et al are at fault for not instituting stronger access controls.
    4. The leaker is at fault for intentionally leaking user private data. (Imagine if a "whistleblower" "leaked" private health records to prove some third party kept health records.)

    You forgot number 5.

    5. All of the above.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2