Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by FatPhil on Sunday July 21 2019, @08:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the throw-the-facebook-at-them dept.

FTC 'Failed Miserably' in Punishing Facebook With $5 Billion Fine, Democrats Say

The Federal Trade Commission, which has been investigating Facebook in the wake of its massive Cambridge Analytica scandal, has voted to approve levying a massive $5 billion fine against the social media giant, according to reporting in both the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post. It's the single largest fine against a tech company by the FTC to date, but its inadequacy to curtail future breaches of this sort already has progressive lawmakers furious

Facebook was aware of a fine of this magnitude potentially coming down the pike for some time, and braced for a hit between $3 billion and $5 billion. The approval vote—which reportedly split down party lines, with three Republicans voting in favor and two Democrats against—was on the higher end of the expected spectrum.

This is expected to cap the agency's investigation into the data-mining scandal that compromised up to 87 million Facebook users' personal data. The data was originally harvested using a seemingly benign quiz app on the platform but was later potentially used by Cambridge Analytica, a political consultancy, for the unrelated purpose of political ad targeting.

Both the FTC and Facebook declined to comment. [...]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 21 2019, @09:37PM (6 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 21 2019, @09:37PM (#869730) Journal

    Well - you should care. The objective here, is to discourage bad behaviour. Taking large sums of money away from any person, or group of persons, is likely to discourage that conduct that was found objectionable. That lost money, plus government oversight/supervision should help to keep everyone more honest. Unless, of course, your name is Jeffrey Epstein, and you can donate large sums of money to your jailer, in which case you can do whatever the hell you want to do.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 21 2019, @11:26PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 21 2019, @11:26PM (#869766)

    Take large amounts of money away from facebook and give it to the government? What have we gained?

    All I see is that one of the worlds biggest manipulative and evil spying organizations just transferred funds to its boss...

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday July 22 2019, @12:11AM (4 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 22 2019, @12:11AM (#869775) Journal

    Taking large sums of money away from any person, or group of persons, is likely to discourage that conduct that was found objectionable.

    Unless the taking of large sums is more objectionable, which apparently was the case with AC's viewpoint.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 22 2019, @12:17AM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 22 2019, @12:17AM (#869777)

      How do you get that from what I said? I said give it to the victims instead of the government.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 22 2019, @12:44AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 22 2019, @12:44AM (#869781)

        This is khallow, he has no shame in pursuing his own agenda.

      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday July 22 2019, @12:59AM (1 child)

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 22 2019, @12:59AM (#869784) Journal
        Who are the victims? 87 million people have an alleged claim to the money. So does the DNC.
        • (Score: 1) by Acabatag on Monday July 22 2019, @03:00AM

          by Acabatag (2885) on Monday July 22 2019, @03:00AM (#869815)

          Give it to 87,000 lawyers?

          Hell no, that only encourages them.