Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by FatPhil on Monday July 22 2019, @05:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the think-you-see-me?-no-you-don't! dept.

Chrome 76 prevents NYT and other news sites from detecting Incognito Mode

Google Chrome 76 will close a loophole that websites use to detect when people use the browser's Incognito Mode.

Over the past couple of years, you may have noticed some websites preventing you from reading articles while using a browser's private mode. The Boston Globe began doing this in 2017, requiring people to log in to paid subscriber accounts in order to read in private mode. The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, and other newspapers impose identical restrictions.

Chrome 76 - which is in beta now and is scheduled to hit the stable channel on July 30 - prevents these websites from discovering that you're in private mode. Google explained the change yesterday in a blog post titled, "Protecting private browsing in Chrome."

Google wrote:

Today, some sites use an unintended loophole to detect when people are browsing in Incognito Mode. Chrome's FileSystem API is disabled in Incognito Mode to avoid leaving traces of activity on someone's device. Sites can check for the availability of the FileSystem API and, if they receive an error message, determine that a private session is occurring and give the user a different experience.

With the release of Chrome 76 scheduled for July 30, the behavior of the FileSystem API will be modified to remedy this method of Incognito Mode detection.

Using the Chrome 76 beta today, I confirmed that the Boston Globe, New York Times, and Los Angeles Times were unable to detect that my browser was in private mode. However, all three sites were able to detect private mode in Safari for Mac, Firefox, and Chrome 75.

Google acknowledged that websites might find new loopholes to detect private mode, but it pledged to close those, too. "Chrome will likewise work to remedy any other current or future means of Incognito Mode detection," Google's blog post said. [...]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Monday July 22 2019, @12:59PM

    by Pino P (4721) on Monday July 22 2019, @12:59PM (#869911) Journal

    The difference between a single news article and a movie ticket is that the latter has a greater total price. Each electronic payment incurs a cost that the payment processor bills to the merchant. Some of this cost depends on the total; some does not. For credit cards in the United States, it might be 30 cents plus 3 percent.

    • A movie ticket costs $8 or so. The payment processor sees (0.30 + 0.03 * 8) = $0.54, and the theater sees $7.46.
    • A news outlet charges $0.35 per article. The payment processor sees (0.030+0.03*0.35) = $0.31, and the news outlet sees $0.04.

    This is why a lot of lower-margin brick-and-mortar businesses don't take cards for transactions below $5, and why a lot of online businesses don't sell small goods at all (or sell them only in large multi-packs).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2