Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday July 22 2019, @08:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-a-solid-step dept.

Rocket scientists at Purdue University in west Lafayette, Indiana have come up with a new approach to plasma thrusters which will potentially increase their reliability and efficiency making them more suitable for softball sized nanosatellites, which are becoming more and more common.

Plasma thrusters have traditionally used one of two approaches to fuel. A solid propellant, usually Teflon (polytetrafluoroethylene, that is ablated and vaporized and then passed through a field that accelerates it.

The problem is that this ablation is a hit-and-miss process. The rate is difficult to control, and this can make the thrust non-uniform. Also, the Teflon surface sometimes breaks down and ejects debris in the form of macroparticles that interfere with the engine operation.

What's more, the igniter that triggers the flashover process can become damaged over time. All these problems ultimately limit the efficiency of the solid-fuel plasma thrusters to less than 15%.

The other common way is to store the propellant as a gas. This increases the efficiency of a plasma thruster by up to 70%.

But these systems are bulky and complex, and the gas itself has a significantly larger volume than an equivalent solid mass. That makes it hard to build into a nanosat.

According to lead author Adam Patel, these issues can be addressed by storing the propellant as a liquid, which "could potentially overcome several disadvantages associated with traditional pulsed plasma thruster devices"

The team has built and, using a vacuum chamber, tested a proof-of-principle micro-propulsion system fed by liquid propellant. The liquid they used was pentaphenyl trimethyl trisiloxane (C33H34O2Si3), a viscous liquid with low vapor pressure that is also an excellent dielectric.

The advantage of this kind of igniter is that the threshold voltage is always the same, and so the amount of energy required for flashover is always limited. This limits the potential damage to the flashover assembly over time.

In tests, Patel and co used the igniter for upwards of 1.5 million flashover events without observing any significant damage to the device. Other designs can sometimes fail after only 400 firing cycles.

The test device was able to generate an exhaust velocity of 32km/sec and 5.8 Newtons of thrust making it a potentially (not)solid option for future nanosats.

Reference
arxiv.org/abs/1907.00169 : Liquid-Fed Pulsed Plasma Thruster for Propelling Nanosatellites


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Immerman on Monday July 22 2019, @02:00PM

    by Immerman (3985) on Monday July 22 2019, @02:00PM (#869946)

    Depends where you use it. Earth's effective temperature (i.e. the excepted temperature based solely on its albedo and sun exposure, before atmospheric effects, etc are taken into account) is 255K (-18C). A true blackbody in our orbit would be 279K (6C). And that's before you consider the additional heat radiating from Earth. So really, keeping satellite propellant above -25C is unlikely to be a serious problem. Might not be the best propellant choice for a mission to Neptune though.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3