Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday July 26 2019, @06:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the have-you-tried-turning-it-off-and-back-on-again? dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Airbus A350 software bug forces airlines to turn planes off and on every 149 hours

Some models of Airbus A350 airliners still need to be hard rebooted after exactly 149 hours, despite warnings from the EU Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) first issued two years ago.

In a mandatory airworthiness directive (AD) reissued earlier this week, EASA urged operators to turn their A350s off and on again to prevent "partial or total loss of some avionics systems or functions".

The revised AD, effective from tomorrow (26 July), exempts only those new A350-941s which have had modified software pre-loaded on the production line. For all other A350-941s, operators need to completely power the airliner down before it reaches 149 hours of continuous power-on time.

Concerningly, the original 2017 AD was brought about by "in-service events where a loss of communication occurred between some avionics systems and avionics network" (sic). The impact of the failures ranged from "redundancy loss" to "complete loss on a specific function hosted on common remote data concentrator and core processing input/output modules".

In layman's English, this means that prior to 2017, at least some A350s flying passengers were suffering unexplained failures of potentially flight-critical digital systems.

Not a power of two. I wonder why 149 hours?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by coolgopher on Friday July 26 2019, @07:10AM (7 children)

    by coolgopher (1157) on Friday July 26 2019, @07:10AM (#871361)

    double is neither integral, nor unsigned. At least not on any system/language I've ever worked on (and it's been a few by now).

    Other than that, sadly true.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by sshelton76 on Friday July 26 2019, @07:13AM (6 children)

    by sshelton76 (7978) on Friday July 26 2019, @07:13AM (#871362)

    Haha, good catch! I'm tired and writing from memory.

    • (Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @09:53AM (5 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @09:53AM (#871390)

      Yeah, inventing colorful stories from mishmashed memories is tiresome. Like fitting an square peg int type in a double round hole.
      In actual real life stories that kind of lapsus just don't happen.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @10:37AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @10:37AM (#871404)

        What are you, nutty? We're reading a story about it happening to an international airline manufacturer, and you say it doesn't happen!

        ROTFL

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @02:52PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @02:52PM (#871490)

        You're right. No one would ever be stupid enough to farm out work to the retarded monkeys in India.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @08:57PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @08:57PM (#871620)

          Even more retarded - letting the same monkeys INTO other countries and allowing them to TAKE OVER "services"...

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @03:03PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @03:03PM (#871495)

        in a double round hole.

        Moebius has been here?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 27 2019, @12:03PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 27 2019, @12:03PM (#871872)

          But Möebius one side coin would fit in Pythagoras' square circle?