Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday July 26 2019, @06:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the rattling-sabres dept.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un inspected the demonstration of a "new-type tactical guided weapon" on Thursday as a warning to South Korea to stop importing high-tech weapons and conducting joint military exercises with the United States, state media KCNA said on Friday.

North Korea test-fired two new short-range ballistic missiles on Thursday, South Korean officials said, its first missile test since Kim and US President Donald Trump agreed to revive denuclearisation talks last month.

The KCNA report did not mention Trump or the US, but it said Kim criticised South Korean authorities for carrying on with joint exercises, which are usually conducted with US troops.

"We cannot but develop nonstop super-powerful weapon systems to remove the potential and direct threats to the security of our country that exist in the South," Kim said, according to KCNA.

He accused South Koreans of "double dealing" for saying they support peace but simultaneously importing new weapons and conducting military drills.

South Korea's leader should stop such "suicidal acts" and "should not make a mistake of ignoring the warning," Kim said.

Kim said he was satisfied with the rapid response and low-altitude trajectory of the weapon, which he said would make it difficult to intercept.

Seoul's National Security Council said on Thursday it believed the missiles were a new type of ballistic missile, but it would make a final assessment with the US.

Ballistic missile tests would be a violation of UN Security Council resolutions that ban North Korean use of such technology. North Korea rejects the restriction as an infringement of its right to self-defence.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by DeathMonkey on Friday July 26 2019, @09:40PM (3 children)

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday July 26 2019, @09:40PM (#871630) Journal

    If that were true Clinton would have won in 2016. Afterall, there was a paid army of trolls reminding us about how terrible she was on a daily basis.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @10:11PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 26 2019, @10:11PM (#871639)

    I can go find my posts on this very site from early 2016 saying Trump was going to win because you idiots wouldn't stop your juvenile and incoherent ranting about him.

    The stuff about Clinton did not even come close. Every fucking unrelated thread had some moron who couldn't help themselves advertising for him by mentioning how stupid/racist/orange/etc Trump was.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by fustakrakich on Friday July 26 2019, @10:30PM

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Friday July 26 2019, @10:30PM (#871646) Journal

    Really? You still believe that's why she lost?

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 27 2019, @04:43AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 27 2019, @04:43AM (#871772)

    Maybe the difference was that the detractors were making valid points about Hillary's criminal behavior, whereas the bad points about Trump were lost in the noise of emo screaming.