Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Sunday July 28 2019, @07:50AM   Printer-friendly
from the pretty-RISC-V-purchase dept.

Alibaba Crafts A 16-Core RISC-V Chip @ 2.5GHz

Alibaba this week announced a RISC-V 64-bit processor comprised of 16 cores at 2.5GHz. The Chinese RISC-V CPU is fabbed at 12nm and this RISC-V processor supports out of order execution. This Alibaba design achieves a 7.1 Coremark/MHz rating, a great deal faster than any other publicly announced RISC-V processor. It's still not as fast as say the newest AMD Ryzen 9 or Intel Core i7/i9 parts, but it's certainly much better than all of the other RISC-V processors/SoCs we've seen announced to date. Unfortunately additional details on this Alibaba design are light.

Also at Tom's Hardware.

Related: Alibaba Cloud Climbs to Top 5
Linux Foundation and RISC-V Proponents Launch CHIPS Alliance
Qualcomm Invests in RISC-V Startup SiFive


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @11:35AM (11 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @11:35AM (#872263)

    Google doesn't design or fabricate cpus, wtf are you talking about?

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday July 28 2019, @11:39AM (4 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday July 28 2019, @11:39AM (#872266) Journal

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor_processing_unit [wikipedia.org]

    As to the rest, the hobbit will have to weigh in.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @12:49PM (3 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @12:49PM (#872280)

      That is not a CPU.

      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday July 28 2019, @01:32PM (2 children)

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday July 28 2019, @01:32PM (#872290) Journal

        OP didn't say "CPU".

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @01:37PM (1 child)

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @01:37PM (#872291)

          But they did say "This is why google is under investigation". Where "this" refers to this Alibaba CPU.

          • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Monday July 29 2019, @03:03PM

            by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 29 2019, @03:03PM (#872658) Homepage Journal

            The OP actually said, "it's why they are now the target of an antitrust investigation."
            The referent of "it" isn't completely clear, but it appears to be the "AI partnership with communist china".

            Not just the Alibaba CPU.

  • (Score: 2) by The Shire on Sunday July 28 2019, @03:54PM (5 children)

    by The Shire (5824) on Sunday July 28 2019, @03:54PM (#872313)

    Chinese manufacturers know their chip fabs are a decade or more behind the West so they are turning instead to a technique companies like nvidia are using by integrating bleeding edge AI circuitry with their low end RISC-v processors. That bleeding edge AI tech is coming from Google and its tech they refuse to develop in partnership with the US. So we have an American company working to advance the goals of communist China while at the same time withholding that IP from the US.

    Google doesn't design or fabricate cpus, wtf are you talking about?

    You are correct - Google/Alphabet do not design or fabricate cpus but they do develop and design the logic and processes behind their AI systems which are then used to give china a leg up on the industry. I wrongly assumed this would be common knowledge for folks on a site like this but it appears there are "anonymous cowards" out there that haven't been keeping up to date.

    • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @05:43PM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @05:43PM (#872338)

      they do develop and design the logic and processes behind their AI systems

      Which has nothing to do with designing a cpu like the one this article is about. Designing a TPU is not the same thing as designing a CPU or GPU.

      There is a reason Intel hasn't be able to develop GPUS that are competitive with NVIDIA and AMD. The knowledge does not just transfer from one type of processor to the next.

      • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday July 28 2019, @06:30PM (3 children)

        by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday July 28 2019, @06:30PM (#872365) Journal

        There is a reason Intel hasn't be able to develop GPUS that are competitive with NVIDIA and AMD. The knowledge does not just transfer from one type of processor to the next.

        They've always had the knowledge, Intel integrated graphics is on hundreds of millions of systems and "good enough" for many users, and they are reentering the discrete GPU market [tomshardware.com] next year.

        --
        [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @06:41PM (2 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 28 2019, @06:41PM (#872370)

          Intel makes low tier gpus. They cannot compete with NVIDIA and AMD.

          • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday July 28 2019, @06:50PM (1 child)

            by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Sunday July 28 2019, @06:50PM (#872375) Journal

            We'll see next year.

            --
            [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 29 2019, @06:31AM

              by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 29 2019, @06:31AM (#872545)

              Didn't Intel poach quite a few graphics people from AMD and the others recently? I wouldn't be surprised if their cards are good, and if they have good linux support I'd buy one in a heartbeat (and there's no reason to believe they wouldn't have great 1st class support).