Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday July 28 2019, @07:35PM   Printer-friendly
from the can-you-hear-me-now? dept.

Submitted via IRC for AnonymousLuser

Physicists count sound particles with quantum microphone

Stanford physicists have developed a "quantum microphone" so sensitive that it can measure individual particles of sound, called phonons.

The device, which is detailed July 24 in the journal Nature, could eventually lead to smaller, more efficient quantum computers that operate by manipulating sound rather than light.

"We expect this device to allow new types of quantum sensors, transducers and storage devices for future quantum machines," said study leader Amir Safavi-Naeini, an assistant professor of applied physics at Stanford's School of Humanities and Sciences.

First proposed by Albert Einstein in 1907, phonons are packets of vibrational energy emitted by jittery atoms. These indivisible packets, or quanta, of motion manifest as sound or heat, depending on their frequencies.

Like photons, which are the quantum carriers of light, phonons are quantized, meaning their vibrational energies are restricted to discrete values—similar to how a staircase is composed of distinct steps.

"Sound has this granularity that we don't normally experience," Safavi-Naeini said. "Sound, at the quantum level, crackles."

[...] Mastering the ability to precisely generate and detect phonons could help pave the way for new kinds of quantum devices that are able to store and retrieve information encoded as particles of sound or that can convert seamlessly between optical and mechanical signals.

Such devices could conceivably be made more compact and efficient than quantum machines that use photons, since phonons are easier to manipulate and have wavelengths that are thousands of times smaller than light particles.

"Right now, people are using photons to encode these states. We want to use phonons, which brings with it a lot of advantages," Safavi-Naeini said. "Our device is an important step toward making a 'mechanical quantum mechanical' computer."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by GDX on Sunday July 28 2019, @11:02PM

    by GDX (1950) on Sunday July 28 2019, @11:02PM (#872435)

    That is somewhat correct, the wavelength of a phonon is always going to be lower that of a photon at the same frequency. Normally when we talk about the wavelength we talk about the one used for light witch is based in the speed of light in vacuum and actually it's a simplified vision of it, but when we talk about sound its wavelength is based on the speed of sound with is much slower than the speed of light (and highly dependent on the medium).

    Examples:

    Wavelength: 650nm
    Frequency: 460 Thz (blue ligth)
    Frequency: 28.23 Ghz (sound on carbon, 18350 m/s)
    Frequency: 3.4 Ghz (sound one silicon, 2200 m/s)
    Frequency: 528 Mhz (sound one air, 343 m/s)

    Frequency: 10 THz
    Wavelength: 29.98 um (far infrared ligth)
    Wavelength: 1.83 nm (sound on carbon, 18350 m/s) theoretical as i don't know frequency limit in carbon for sound.
    Wavelength: 220 pm (sound one silicon, 2200 m/s) theoretical as i don't know frequency limit in silicon for sound.
    Wavelength: 34 pm (sound one air, 343 m/s) actually impossible due to physics as this frequency far exceeds the frequency limit for sound in air.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=1, Informative=3, Total=4
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5