Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Monday July 29 2019, @01:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the water-is-wet dept.

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

Supervisors driven by bottom line fail to get top performance from employees: 'Bottom-line mentality' can lead to loss of employee respect and loyalty, research shows

Supervisors driven by profits could actually be hurting their coveted bottom lines by losing the respect of their employees, who counter by withholding performance, according to a new study led by Baylor University.

The study, "The Influence of Supervisor Bottom-Line Mentality and Employee Bottom-Line Mentality on Leader-Member Exchange and Subsequent Employee Performance," is published in the journal Human Relations.

"Supervisors who focus only on profits to the exclusion of caring about other important outcomes, such as employee well-being or environmental or ethical concerns, turn out to be detrimental to employees," said lead researcher Matthew Quade, Ph.D., assistant professor of management in Baylor University's Hankamer School of Business. "This results in relationships that are marked by distrust, dissatisfaction and lack of affection for the supervisor. And ultimately, that leads to employees who are less likely to complete tasks at a high level and less likely to go above and beyond the call of duty."

While other studies have examined the impact of bottom-line mentality (BLM) on employee behavior, Quade said this is the first to identify why employees respond with negative behaviors to supervisors they perceive to have BLM.

Matthew J Quade, Benjamin D McLarty, Julena M Bonner. The influence of supervisor bottom-line mentality and employee bottom-line mentality on leader-member exchange and subsequent employee performance. Human Relations, 2019; 001872671985839 DOI: 10.1177/0018726719858394


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by Thexalon on Monday July 29 2019, @07:08PM (1 child)

    by Thexalon (636) on Monday July 29 2019, @07:08PM (#872773)

    Apparently, the dominance model works in military contexts, in part because in most contexts no decision is usually worse than any decision, and because the winning move is often on its surface near-suicidal (if not actually suicidal) to at least some of the grunts and no grunt would stand for it if they weren't drilled into the dominance model by the trauma of "basic training".

    This doesn't, however, work as well in any context where independent thinking is more valuable than prompt action.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=2, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 29 2019, @08:40PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 29 2019, @08:40PM (#872806)

    Wrong. The military leadership is weak and not respected. Any opportunity to punish a subordinate is also an opportunity for the subordinate to incriminate the leadership. Everyone plays a game but nobody is actually scared of their boss. I've taken to getting several of them fired and then left because the whole place made me wanna puke.