Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday July 30 2019, @11:39AM   Printer-friendly

Submitted via IRC for Bytram

College Financial-Aid Loophole: Wealthy Parents Transfer Guardianship of Their Teens to Get Aid

Amid an intense national furor over the fairness of college admissions, the Education Department is looking into a tactic that has been used in some suburbs here, in which wealthy parents transfer legal guardianship of their college-bound children to relatives or friends so the teens can claim financial aid, say people familiar with the matter.

The strategy caught the department's attention amid a spate of guardianship transfers here. It means that only the children's earnings were considered in their financial-aid applications, not the family income or savings. That has led to awards of scholarships and access to federal financial aid designed for the poor, these people said.

Several universities in Illinois say they are looking into the practice, which is legal. "Our financial-aid resources are limited and the practice of wealthy parents transferring the guardianship of their children to qualify for need-based financial aid—or so-called opportunity hoarding—takes away resources from middle- and low-income students," said Andrew Borst, director of undergraduate enrollment at the University of Illinois. "This is legal, but we question the ethics."

Also At:
https://www.propublica.org/article/university-of-illinois-financial-aid-fafsa-parents-guardianship-children-students
https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/7/29/20746376/u-of-i-parents-giving-up-custody-kids-get-need-based-college-financial-aid-university-illinois


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Redundant) by khallow on Wednesday July 31 2019, @01:59AM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 31 2019, @01:59AM (#873370) Journal
    Medicare, for example - covers both angles. Meanwhile, consider the person I replied to in the first place. Why brag about your enlightened system's ability to decide who lives and dies without considering what the criteria is? It's ripe for exploitation.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Redundant=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Redundant' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 31 2019, @10:00PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 31 2019, @10:00PM (#873742)

    People could still pay for the operation themselves, and even discounting your bullshit uninformed ranting the US health insurance industry already does this. Except the for-profit insurance is even WORSE than the judgment from a panel of doctors.

    You're wrong on every level.