SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for Sulla
On a bright fall morning at Stanford, Tom Mullaney is telling me what's wrong with QWERTY keyboards. Mullaney is not a technologist, nor is he one of those Dvorak keyboard enthusiasts. He's a historian of modern China and we're perusing his exhibit of Chinese typewriters and keyboards, the curation of which has led Mullaney to the conclusion that China is rising ahead technologically while the West falls behind, clinging to its QWERTY keyboard.
Now this was and still is an unusual view because Chinese—with its 75,000 individual characters rather than an alphabet—had historically been the language considered incompatible with modern technology. How do you send a telegram or use a typewriter with all those characters? How do you even communicate with the modern world? If you're a Cambridge-educated classicist enamored with the Greeks, you might just conclude Chinese script is "archaic." Long live the alphabet.
But, Mullaney argues, the invention of the computer could turn China's enormous catalog of characters into an advantage.
His argument is [...] about our relationship to computers, not just as physical objects but as conduits to intangible software. Typing English on a QWERTY computer keyboard, he says, "is about the most basic rudimentary way you can use a keyboard." You press the "a" key and "a" appears on your screen. "It doesn't make use of a computer's processing power and memory and the cheapening thereof." Type "a" on a QWERTY keyboard hooked up to a Chinese computer, on the other hand, and the computer is off anticipating the next characters. Typing in Chinese requires mediation from a layer of software that is obvious to the user.
[...] The Chinese way of inputting text—the software-mediated way—will win out, says Mullaney. Actually, it's already won out. Our mobile phones now have predictive text and autocomplete. It took the constraint of mobile to get Westerners to realize the limits of the simple what-you-type-is-what-you-get keyboard. But even then, you could only get Americans to go so far.
Read more at The Atlantic.
(Score: 2) by Mer on Thursday August 01 2019, @01:03PM (8 children)
So the Chinese method is better because it uses more processing power and the standard takes more memory to implement?
I have no idea what the train of thoughts is here.
Anyway predictive text has"won" if you truly believe phones and tablets will one day completely replace computers. And it may not be the norm but a lot of people turn it off because it interferes with their personal use of language.
And let's not forget all the other flaws ideograms have compared to alphabets: font design, font scaling and not to forget: they rely on a phonetic system to be typed anyway.
Shut up!, he explained.
(Score: 4, Informative) by doke on Thursday August 01 2019, @01:11PM (2 children)
I had to turn off predictive text on my phone because it gets almost every technical word or acronym wrong. It would often change them to something absurd, and I had to spend three times as long proofreading.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 01 2019, @04:45PM
Same, I turned it off and was much less annoyed all the time.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by kazzie on Thursday August 01 2019, @07:01PM
Predictive text is also thoroughly useless if you're bilingual, and expect to be able to type in a minority language.
I've been ignoring predictive text since the days of T9 dictionaries...
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 01 2019, @01:18PM (3 children)
How does one memorize the hundreds of characters and their meanings?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 01 2019, @02:11PM
Flashcards, spaced repetitions training and patience.
(Score: 2) by fyngyrz on Thursday August 01 2019, @04:09PM (1 child)
FTFY
--
Have an urge to follow the masses? Careful:
Sometimes, the "m" is silent.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 01 2019, @05:37PM
Learning the thousands of characters needed to write correctly in Chinese won't be that much different from learning the thousands of lexical rules needed to write correctly in English.
(Score: 3, Funny) by AthanasiusKircher on Thursday August 01 2019, @03:44PM
Oh... Chinese method of input. Sorry, when I started reading your post, I spaced out and thought you were talking about new Microsoft Windows versions over the past 25 years. :)