Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 02 2019, @06:43AM   Printer-friendly
from the when-the-new-shiny-is-not-always-better dept.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kateoflahertyuk/2019/08/01/warning-issued-over-google-chrome-ad-blocking-plans/#75c4a925219a

Google's plans to limit ad blockers in Chrome have already led many users to consider switching browsers. People's anger was made worse by the confirmation that the only people who will avoid the changes to the way ad blockers work in Chrome will be Google's enterprise users. Advertising is at the heart of Google's business model and so unsurprisingly, users have been questioning the software giant's motives.

And now, another prominent voice has entered the debate. Digital rights group the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) says the move will not help security and in fact, will probably hinder it.

The plans, dubbed Manifest V3, represent a major transformation to Chrome extensions including a revamp of the permissions system. As a result, modern ad blockers such as uBlock Origin—which uses Chrome's webRequest API to block ads before they're downloaded–won't work. This is because Manifest V3 sees Google halt the webRequest API's ability to block a particular request before it's loaded. The plans are earmarked for release into the Google Canary channel around now.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 02 2019, @07:37AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 02 2019, @07:37AM (#874517)

    Or PaleMoon "No, No-Script for You!" browsers. They are sooooo fucked.

  • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Friday August 02 2019, @07:54AM

    by MostCynical (2589) on Friday August 02 2019, @07:54AM (#874519) Journal

    Not every [noscript.net] version of palemoon..

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Mer on Friday August 02 2019, @09:48AM

    by Mer (8009) on Friday August 02 2019, @09:48AM (#874541)

    I'll admit the drama between the Noscript devs and the Palemoon devs is idiotic but why do you need Noscript when Palemoon has µmatrix?

    --
    Shut up!, he explained.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 02 2019, @01:20PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 02 2019, @01:20PM (#874600)

    Weird, I'm using noscript in palemoon right now. I guess your fanny got flustered by a warning message that used leftover default mozilla scary text they didn't change.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 03 2019, @05:24AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 03 2019, @05:24AM (#875011)

      Same here. I'm using Pale Moon 28.6.1 with NoScript 5.1.8.6, on Linux.