According to Ofcom, speeds of 24Mbps are currently available to 94 per cent of premises. Yet only 45 per cent have signed up, sticking with their poxy standard ADSL packages of around 11-12Mbps.
A survey of 3,000 customers by Which? suggests that the most common reason for not bothering to upgrade was because people felt happy with their current speeds.
So if people can't be arsed to upgrade from creaking ADSL services to the much-derided "superfast" fibre-to-the-cabinet (FTTC) speeds, why on earth are they going to bother with the far more expensive full-fibre speeds?
(Score: 2) by stormreaver on Friday August 09 2019, @01:30PM (1 child)
I had AT&T 24mb (I forgot the up speed, but I think it was 6mb) Uverse for years. It cost me $70/month. Then another $45 for the landline phone service. When Mediacom offered free installation for their 100mb/40(?) package at $50 a month, I jumped on it. While I was getting by on 24mb, the ability to give AT&T the middle finger was irresistible. Plus getting four times the speed for 30% less was a no-brainer. I replaced the $45/month landline service with a $45/month family cell plan.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 09 2019, @01:36PM
Do they try to force you to pay extra to have a 'phone line' on a fiber connection?