Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday August 09 2019, @10:17AM   Printer-friendly
from the betteridge-says-no dept.

According to Ofcom, speeds of 24Mbps are currently available to 94 per cent of premises. Yet only 45 per cent have signed up, sticking with their poxy standard ADSL packages of around 11-12Mbps.

A survey of 3,000 customers by Which? suggests that the most common reason for not bothering to upgrade was because people felt happy with their current speeds.

So if people can't be arsed to upgrade from creaking ADSL services to the much-derided "superfast" fibre-to-the-cabinet (FTTC) speeds, why on earth are they going to bother with the far more expensive full-fibre speeds?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by stormreaver on Friday August 09 2019, @01:30PM (1 child)

    by stormreaver (5101) on Friday August 09 2019, @01:30PM (#877883)

    If they offered 100Mbps that would be worth the upgrade....

    I had AT&T 24mb (I forgot the up speed, but I think it was 6mb) Uverse for years. It cost me $70/month. Then another $45 for the landline phone service. When Mediacom offered free installation for their 100mb/40(?) package at $50 a month, I jumped on it. While I was getting by on 24mb, the ability to give AT&T the middle finger was irresistible. Plus getting four times the speed for 30% less was a no-brainer. I replaced the $45/month landline service with a $45/month family cell plan.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 09 2019, @01:36PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 09 2019, @01:36PM (#877887)

    Do they try to force you to pay extra to have a 'phone line' on a fiber connection?