Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Friday August 09 2019, @06:59PM   Printer-friendly
from the to-err-is-human-to-forgive-divine dept.

'It's Crazy': Chase Bank Forgiving all Debt Owed by its Canadian Credit Card Customers:

Bank says this was the best way to exit Canada after folding its Amazon and Marriott Visa cards

Finally, a good-news story about credit card debt.

U.S.-based Chase Bank is forgiving all outstanding debt owed by users of its two Canadian credit cards: the Amazon.ca Rewards Visa and the Marriott Rewards Premier Visa. The bank retired both cards last year and said it's wiping out cardholders' debt to complete its exit from the Canadian credit card market.

[...]After 13 years in the Canadian market, Chase decided to fold its two Visa cards in March 2018.

The bank — which is part of global financial services firm JPMorgan Chase & Co. — wouldn't say how many Canadians had signed up for the cards or how much debt was outstanding.

[...]Credit card rewards expert Patrick Sojka said Chase likely concluded that debt forgiveness was ultimately cheaper than continuing to collect credit card payments in Canada.

"They're still probably paying taxes, paying accountants, and for them, they just probably worked it out and [said], 'Let's just forgive the debt and fully get out of the country.'"

But he's stumped as to why the bank didn't instead opt to sell the debt to a third-party debt collector, which would allow Chase to recoup some cash.

"It is definitely a head-scratcher, for sure," said Sojka, the founder of Rewards Canada, a site that tracks reward programs.

Chase told CBC News it chose the debt-forgiveness route so that everyone benefited.

"Ultimately, we felt it was a better decision for all parties, particularly our customers," spokesperson Maria Martinez said in an email.

The windfall is generally not considered taxable unless the credit card was used to purchase items for their business. As always, check with your tax advisor if you are at all unsure.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by barbara hudson on Friday August 09 2019, @08:10PM (5 children)

    by barbara hudson (6443) <barbara.Jane.hudson@icloud.com> on Friday August 09 2019, @08:10PM (#878016) Journal
    These are retailer-branded credit cards. No new ones have been issued in 2 years as the retailers moved clients to a different card issuer with their store brand. Past a certain point, maintaining the dwindling base is too costly, and nobody wants to buy old credit card debt.
    --
    SoylentNews is social media. Says so right in the slogan. Soylentnews is people, not tech.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday August 09 2019, @10:10PM (4 children)

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday August 09 2019, @10:10PM (#878038) Homepage

    Just what is the point of retailer-branded credit cards? An extra 5-cent per-purchase discount at Best Buy?

    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 09 2019, @10:14PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 09 2019, @10:14PM (#878039)

      Now we know what Soylentil does not have a credit rating!

      • (Score: 1, Flamebait) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday August 09 2019, @10:17PM

        by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday August 09 2019, @10:17PM (#878042) Homepage

        I have a credit score of 237, which strongly implies that I have the intelligence it takes to Jew the Jews.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 10 2019, @07:39AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 10 2019, @07:39AM (#878144)

      For whom?

      The people using them will do it for the perks, or to better track spending by origin, or set them to restricted use, or use them for children.

      The stores will do them for increased loyalty, a cut of the transaction fee, and because studies show that people who have them tend to spend significantly more.

      The card companies will do them for the transaction fee, because people with them spend more, and because there is a demand that they want to fill before their competitors without that much of a marginal cost per new store.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by JoeMerchant on Sunday August 11 2019, @12:41AM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Sunday August 11 2019, @12:41AM (#878586)

      Apparently, store cards have a higher risk appetite than general credit cards. At least in the 1980s as a young person with no credit history you pretty much had to build your initial credit history you on the store cards.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]