Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday August 12 2019, @03:50PM   Printer-friendly
from the old-ways-might-still-be-best dept.

The US Navy will replace the touchscreen throttle and helm controls currently installed in its destroyers with mechanical ones starting in 2020, says USNI News. The move comes after the National Transportation Safety Board released an accident report from a 2017 collision, which cites the design of the ship’s controls as a factor in the accident.

On August 21st, 2017, the USS John S. McCain collided with the Alnic MC, a Liberian oil tanker, off the coast of Singapore. The report provides a detailed overview of the actions that led to the collision: when crew members tried to split throttle and steering control between consoles, they lost control of the ship, putting it into the path of the tanker. The crash killed 10 sailors and injured 48 aboard the McCain.

The report says that while fatigue and lack of training played a role in the accident, the design of the ship’s control console were also contributing factors. Located in the middle of the McCain’s bridge, the Ship’s Control Console (SCC) features a pair of touch-screens on both the Helm and Lee Helm stations, through which the crew could steer and propel the ship. Investigators found that the crew had placed it in “backup manual mode,” which removed computer-assisted help, because it allowed for “more direct form of communication between steering and the SSC.” That setting meant that any crew member at another station could take over steering operations, and when the crew tried to regain control of the ship from multiple stations, control “shifted from the lee helm, to aft steering, to the helm, and back to aft steering.”

The NTSB report calls out the configuration of the bridge’s systems, pointing out that the decision to transfer controls while in the strait helped lead to the accident, and that the procedures for transferring the controls from one station to another were complicated, further contributing to the confusion. Specifically, the board points to the touchscreens on the bridge, noting that mechanical throttles are generally preferred because “they provide both immediate and tactile feedback to the operator.” The report notes that had mechanical controls been present, the helmsmen would have likely been alerted that there was an issue early on, and recommends that the Navy better adhere to better design standards.

[...] Touchscreens weren’t the only issue in the collision: the report calls out that several crew members on the bridge at the time weren’t familiar with the systems that they were overseeing and were inexperienced in their roles, and that many were fatigued, with an average of 4.9 hours of sleep between the 14 crew members present. The report recommended that the Navy conduct better training for the bridge systems, update the controls and associated documentation, and ensure that Navy personnel aren’t tired when they’re on the job.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 12 2019, @08:23PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 12 2019, @08:23PM (#879367)

    In fairness, that does sound very futuristic. The, "form before function" was pioneered by Apple (remember the "iMac, it comes in different colors!"), and is very much a modern invention. Boring-but-practical was so 1980s. The future has been "shiny, but impractical to use" for some time now.

    Futuristic doesn't mean "better," and if I draw a straight-line forecast, a car with sleek-looking-but-useless LEDs and touchscreen-everything sounds very reasonable. Depressing, but reasonable.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=2, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by EEMac on Tuesday August 13 2019, @12:15AM

    by EEMac (6423) on Tuesday August 13 2019, @12:15AM (#879417)

    I LOVED my "space egg" iMac! That thing looked absolutely fantastic with all the components in once place. Just plug in power, the keyboard, and the phone jack, and I was on the internet! So neat, so clean!

    . . . for about a month. Over the next two years, I added:
    1. A better keyboard, which meant the mouse needed its own extension cord.
    2. A DVD burner so I could actually, you know, back stuff up
    3. A video capture device to input photos and videos to friends
    4. Speakers better than the (admittedly decent) ones included
    5. A printer
    6. A webcam
    7. A connection for my digital camera

    By the time I was done, I had a spaghetti system of cables all over the place. Kind of like a PC tower or PowerMac, but without the power or expandability.

    My most recent computer is a PC tower. The boring-but-practical 1980s would be proud! Sure, there's cables. But they're there for a reason, and buying something prettier doesn't get rid of them.