Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday August 14 2019, @09:44AM   Printer-friendly
from the poison-pen dept.

With each news cycle, the false-information system grows more efficient.

Even on an internet bursting at the seams with conspiracy theories and hyperpartisanship, Saturday marked a new chapter in our post-truth, “choose your own reality” crisis story.

It began early Saturday morning, when news broke that the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein had apparently hanged himself in a Manhattan jail. Mr. Epstein’s death, coming just one day after court documents from one of his alleged victims were unsealed, sparked immediate suspicion from journalists, politicians and the usual online fringes.

Within minutes, Trump appointees, Fox Business hosts and Twitter pundits revived a decades old conspiracy theory, linking the Clinton family to supposedly suspicious deaths. #ClintonBodyCount and #ClintonCrimeFamily trended on Twitter. Around the same time, an opposite hashtag — #TrumpBodyCount — emerged, focused on President Trump’s decades-old ties to Mr. Epstein. Each hashtag was accompanied by GIFs and memes picturing Mr. Epstein with the Clintons or with Mr. Trump to serve as a viral accusation of foul play.

The dueling hashtags and their attendant toxicity are a grim testament to our deeply poisoned information ecosystem — one that’s built for speed and designed to reward the most incendiary impulses of its worst actors. It has ushered in a parallel reality unrooted in fact and helped to push conspiratorial thinking into the cultural mainstream. And with each news cycle, the system grows more efficient, entrenching its opposing camps. The poison spreads.

It's time to end "trending" on Twitter

By now you've probably read enough about the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, his death in a Manhattan jail, and the attendant conspiracy theories that consumed social networks over the weekend. President Trump led the charge, retweeting a conspiracy theory that sought to implicate former President Bill Clinton.

While there is much blame to go around, Charlie Warzel finds that Twitter bears a special responsibility for what one researcher termed "the Disinformation World Cup." Warzel writes:

At the heart of the online fiasco is Twitter, which has come to largely program the political conversation and much of the press. Twitter is magnetic during huge breaking stories; news junkies flock to it for up-to-the-second information. But early on, there's often a vast discrepancy between the attention that is directed at the platform and the available information about the developing story. That gap is filled by speculation and, via its worst users, rumormongering and conspiracy theories.

On Saturday, Twitter's trending algorithms hoovered up the worst of this detritus, curating, ranking and then placing it in the trending module on the right side of its website. Despite being a highly arbitrary and mostly "worthless metric," trending topics on Twitter are often interpreted as a vague signal of the importance of a given subject.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Alfred on Wednesday August 14 2019, @02:25PM (2 children)

    by Alfred (4006) on Wednesday August 14 2019, @02:25PM (#880216) Journal
    There is no information ecosystem so we shouldn't call it that. There is a large cesspool of drivel available via internet. Also available via internet is a little bit of actual information. Unfortunately that information is tainted by those tracking the cesspool crap in. The only way to really know what happened at an event is to be there. The only way to have clean information is to curate it yourself. The next best is to have information agents that you trust. Since journalism is really just propaganda for hire, all you can do is vet your friends wisely.

    I vote to create a new moniker to more accurately represent the internet. Maybe, "Content Cesspool" or "Intelligence Exclusion Zone." Those are not that good and I expect SN could help me find something with a better ring to it.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 14 2019, @02:51PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 14 2019, @02:51PM (#880241)

    There is a large cesspool of drivel available via internet. Also available via internet is a little bit of actual information

    This is everything. The medical literature is the same, 99.99% BS to dig though to salvage that tiny bit of useful information.

    • (Score: 2) by Alfred on Thursday August 15 2019, @01:32PM

      by Alfred (4006) on Thursday August 15 2019, @01:32PM (#880561) Journal
      Too bad critical thinking isn't taught in schools. That is a skill reserved for the 1% so they can have that advantage over us.