UK steps up fight after losing 'measles-free' status
The United Kingdom says it will take steps to halt the spread of misinformation about vaccines as a result of losing its "measles-free" status after the highly infectious disease was declared eliminated in the country three years ago.
Measles, which is almost entirely preventable with two doses of vaccine, is making a comeback globally. In the first half of the year, there have been almost three times as many cases as the same time last year. Cases globally are at the highest level since 2006, according to the World Health Organization.
"After a period of progress where we were once able to declare Britain measles free, we've now seen hundreds of cases of measles in the UK this year. One case of this horrible disease is too many, and I am determined to step up our efforts to tackle its spread," Prime Minister Boris Johnson said in a statement.
UK's Johnson slams 'mumbo-jumbo' about vaccines after measles rates rise
"The UK generally has a great record on fighting measles, but for the first time we're suddenly going in the wrong direction," Johnson said on a visit to a hospital in Truro, south-west England. "I'm afraid people have just been listening to that superstitious mumbo-jumbo on the internet, all that anti-vax stuff, and thinking that the MMR vaccine is a bad idea. That's wrong, please get your kids vaccinated."
See also: UK to pressure social media companies to fight anti-vax info
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Tuesday August 20 2019, @01:37AM (2 children)
Highly likely so. Coming from countries with low level of vaccination, they highly likely had measles during childhood.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by PartTimeZombie on Tuesday August 20 2019, @01:48AM
Where I come from, immigrants are immunised if they haven't already been.
It is just part of the process.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday August 20 2019, @03:19PM
So, uhhhhmmmm, are you making a self-contradictory statement here? Immigrants coming from areas where a disease is prevalent, aren't bringing that disease with them, because - what, exactly? They've already had the disease, so they can't be carriers? Or, their children can't be carriers?
I'll stick with the idea that people coming from an area where a disease is prevalent are likely to carry that disease with them. If those people aren't individually tested, and potential carriers turned back, and/or cured, then you are importing the disease with the people coming into your area.