Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday August 20 2019, @07:07AM   Printer-friendly
from the a-proton-and-a-neutron-star-walk-into-a-black-hole dept.

This past Wednesday (and about 900 million years ago), for the first time according to scientists at Australian National University (ANU) gravitational-wave discovery machines detected a black hole swallowing a neutron star

Professor Susan Scott, from the ANU Research School of Physics, said the achievement completed the team's trifecta of observations on their original wish list, which included the merger of two black holes and the collision of two neutron stars.

"About 900 million years ago, this black hole ate a very dense star, known as a neutron star, like Pac-man—possibly snuffing out the star instantly," said Professor Scott, Leader of the General Relativity Theory and Data Analysis Group at ANU and a Chief Investigator with the ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav).

Professor Scott notes that there is an alternative, but unlikely, possibility as well

there is the slight but intriguing possibility that the swallowed object was a very light black hole—much lighter than any other black hole we know about in the Universe. That would be a truly awesome consolation prize.

[...] The ANU SkyMapper Telescope responded to the detection alert and scanned the entire likely region of space where the event occurred, but we've not found any visual confirmation.

The scientists continue to analyze the data and search for the event in the sky and expect to publish the final results once complete.

Also at c|net.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 20 2019, @11:58AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 20 2019, @11:58AM (#882559)

    so here goes the spell to invoke the "general relativity is not a rubber sheet" band:
    according to newton there's no makimum density, thus a object can become unlimited dense.
    however if we use general relativity a object can become maximally dense so that its gravity doesnt allow light to escape.
    for all purposes, if we visualize this with a rubber sheet, the horizonal sheet with a dense object placed into it will can deform the sheet unlimited. it seems obvious, thus that the object can be moved around on the sheet, making a endless deep pocket anywhere. thus two dense objects can merge.
    with general relativity, the sheet would tear, after reaching a certain density, leaving what commonly is referred as a "blackhole".
    now if two object make a tear in the sheet i dont see how these two tears could move towards eachother.
    also time at event horizon stands still so it would take unlimited time to "move" towards another blackhole.
    thus ... blackholes cannot move or merge ^_^

  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Tuesday August 20 2019, @03:12PM (3 children)

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Tuesday August 20 2019, @03:12PM (#882606) Journal

    Newton says nothing about a maximum density. It's quantum mechanics that normally prevents matter from getting arbitrary dense. But with enough mass, gravity can overcome that.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Tuesday August 20 2019, @04:21PM (2 children)

      by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday August 20 2019, @04:21PM (#882658) Journal

      To be fair, we don't really *know* that gravity can overcome that. Perhaps space stretches a bit under the pressure. Actual wormholes are looking unlikely, but that's not the only alternative. I think we've got good reason to believe that it gets as dense as quarkium, but I'm not at all sure we have convincing reason to believe it ever gets denser, no matter what the pressure. A "black hole" is just a one-way gate (Hawking radiation is a way around it, not a way through it), and we don't really know what's on the other side. We just know our equations break down.

      --
      Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 20 2019, @04:53PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday August 20 2019, @04:53PM (#882679)

        if we have a equation in "quantum mechanics" that uses the "c" (speed of light in vacuum) constant and we assume, with another theory, that nothing can go faster then light, not even causal effect, then ... well a object that gathers light and doesn't (cannot) emit any is a one-way and "stationary" object.
        after thinking about my previous post, i was wondering what would happen if aliens had a spaceship with a big enough "device" to create a "tiny" blackhole.
        assuming the spaceship-laborary was moving at some speed "x" and then create the tiny blackhole, according to my original post it (the tiny blackhole) would stop dead in its tracks but this seems st0pid c'ause of relativity and all the newton stuff.
        so maybe i can correct that and say the speed of all the material that contribute to the blackhole formation is the final "resting speed" of the moving blackhole.
        so blackhole can move if they were created moving.
        however i still think it would be cool if created "blackholes" cannot be influenced by external gravity field once created.
        it's the equivalent of "object are at rest or continue moving without a external influence acting on them"; only nothing can influence a blackhole anymore.
        it's awesome to have a tiny object but super dense (tiny blackhole, tiny as in really really small schwarzschild radius) that is totally impervious to any ... uhm ... errr ... geodesics (that arise after its creation) ^_^

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 21 2019, @06:50AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 21 2019, @06:50AM (#882997)

        To be fair, we also don't know gravity exists. It's just a theory and there are other explanations involving the firmament and God's mysterious ways.