Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday August 20 2019, @04:22PM   Printer-friendly
from the unique-interpretation dept.

In August last year, the AFP obtained a warrant under section 3LA of the Crimes Act to unlock a gold-coloured Samsung phone found in the centre console of the man’s car when he was pulled over and searched.

The man supplied the password for a laptop also in the car, and a second phone did not have a pin to unlock, but when asked about the gold phone, he answered “no comment” and would not provide a password for the phone.

He later claimed it wasn’t his phone and he didn’t know the password to access it.

The federal court last month overturned the magistrate’s decision to grant a warrant forcing the man to provide assistance in unlocking the phone.

The decision was overturned on several grounds, notably judge Richard White found that the Samsung phone was not a computer or data storage device as defined by the federal Crimes Act.

The law does not define a computer, but defines data storage devices as a “thing containing, or designed to contain, data for use by a computer”.

White found that the phone could not be defined as a computer or data storage device.

“While a mobile phone may have the capacity to ‘perform mathematical computations electronically according to a series of stored instructions called a program’, it does not seem apt to call such an item a computer,” he said.

“Mobile phones are primarily devices for communicating although it is now commonplace for them to have a number of other functions ... Again, the very ubiquity of mobile phones suggests that, if the parliament had intended that they should be encompassed by the term ‘computer’ it would have been obvious to say so.”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday August 21 2019, @01:31AM (3 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday August 21 2019, @01:31AM (#882896)

    $150 buys me a small computer, with a 3 megapixel touchscreen display, 64GB flash and 16GB RAM, 8 reasonably fast cores, built in 16 hour battery, bluetooth, wifi, 4G data modem, GPS, accelerometer, gyro, three cameras, HDMI out, fingerprint reader, oh and a phone. It's just too damn bad that Linux distros haven't stretched to support the phones the way they did the RasPi. I've started thinking I'm going to learn Kotlin so I can make programs for this 4G capable Android 9 smartwatch I picked up for $100, but who has the time?

    I've been buying NUCs without OS for the last 8 years or so, just installed Ubuntu 18.04.3 on a 2008 vintage iMac (on which iOS had taken a total planned obsolescence dump), but, still, there are two laptops and one NUC in the house with Windoze 10 on them because occasionally it is easier to just have one of those things around because whatever you're trying to do is just easier there. Those occasions are getting much further and farther in-between, but they still arise once in a rare while.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by number11 on Wednesday August 21 2019, @03:24AM (2 children)

    by number11 (1170) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday August 21 2019, @03:24AM (#882934)

    $150 buys me a small computer, with a 3 megapixel touchscreen display, 64GB flash and 16GB RAM, 8 reasonably fast cores, built in 16 hour battery, bluetooth, wifi, 4G data modem, GPS, accelerometer, gyro, three cameras, HDMI out, fingerprint reader, oh and a phone. It's just too damn bad that Linux distros haven't stretched to support the phones the way they did the RasPi.

    Android is a Linux distro, sort of. Trouble is, the phone stuff is proprietary. Nobody is going to open-source it. Certainly not the chip makers. And one can even make an argument for that... fully open-sourced, one could change the IMEI, clone phones, and do a lot of mischief. Yeah, they can do some of that now, but with OSS any bozo who could figure out how to compile would be able to.

    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday August 21 2019, @10:07AM (1 child)

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday August 21 2019, @10:07AM (#883041)

      I've only scratched the surface of Android, but the blood that has come out so far is classic treadmill: version 22 and up you need to do X, version 24 and up you need to do Y, etc. etc. If you want your app in the store, plan to update it every 3 months at a minimum to keep up with the latest requirements.

      All I'm trying to do is integrate a map, a GPS location, and an MQTT message system for a family tracking app that actually updates location fast enough to practically track down family members, something Google Maps should have an option for in the first place, but every couple of versions of Android they throw a new wrench in it for some excuse or another, all perfectly valid for the billion user base, but B.S. if you really do want to share that info with family members. It's no wonder there's not a decent free version in the store, and the ones I have tried seem to be flaky.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 21 2019, @02:07PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday August 21 2019, @02:07PM (#883129)

        So many are flaky. The eco system is complete bs