Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday August 24 2019, @05:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the what-the-factoring dept.

From ArsTechnica . . .

Alleged "Snake Oil" Crypto Company Sues Over Boos at Black Hat:

Grant's presentation, entitled "Discovery of Quasi-Prime Numbers: What Does this Mean for Encryption," was based on a paper called "Accurate and Infinite Prime Prediction from a Novel Quasi-PrimeAnalytical Methodology." That work was published in March of 2019 through Cornell University's arXiv.org by Grant's co-author Talal Ghannam—a physicist who has self-published a book called The Mystery of Numbers: Revealed through their Digital Root as well as a comic book called The Chronicles of Maroof the Knight: The Byzantine. The paper, a slim five pages, focuses on the use of digital root analysis (a type of calculation that has been used in occult numerology) to rapidly identify prime numbers and a sort of multiplication table for factoring primes.

[...] The Black Hat talk did not go smoothly. People had to be ejected from the room by security because they were heckling and booing Grant.

[...] Cryptographers were extremely skeptical, with some referring to the talk as "snake oil crypto." Even before the event, Mark Carney, a PhD candidate at the University of Leeds, wrote a paper refuting the claims Grant and Ghannam had made in theirs.

Well that could have gone better. Maybe the court trial will be more orderly.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Saturday August 24 2019, @06:53PM (2 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Saturday August 24 2019, @06:53PM (#884862) Homepage
    Not a product of 2 primes, and specifically rejected as an example by the paper itself.

    Did you read the paper?

    I hope not, because I debunked it enough, I hope, such that you shouldn't.

    If you did - you're a fucking idiot, because you didn't understand it (sub-retard, very bad class to fall into)
    If you didn't - you're a fucking idiot, because you're talking out of your arse.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 24 2019, @07:10PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 24 2019, @07:10PM (#884867)

    well. at least you didn't call me a masturbating idiot. I may have sued.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 24 2019, @11:30PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 24 2019, @11:30PM (#884966)

    I shouldn't read a paper because some idiot on the internet said he already debunked it? Ha! I think now I just have to read it!