Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday August 24 2019, @07:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the music-like-background-noises dept.

In a long inteview, Neil Young mentions the effects the technological race to the bottom is having on music and our ability to appreciate it. From ear buds to compounded lossy compression algorithms, most people have lost access to anything resembling the traditional dynamic range and chromatic range that music requires. What to call the sounds that are left? Neil goes into a lot of detail on the problems and some of the, so far unsuccessful, steps he has taken to try to fix the problem.

Neil Young is crankier than a hermit being stung by bees. He hates Spotify. He hates Facebook. He hates Apple. He hates Steve Jobs. He hates what digital technology is doing to music. "I'm only one person standing there going, 'Hey, this is [expletive] up!' " he shouted, ranting away on the porch of his longtime manager Elliot Roberts's house overlooking Malibu Canyon in the sunblasted desert north of Los Angeles.

[...] Producers and engineers often responded to the smaller size and lower quality of these packages by using cheap engineering tricks, like making the softest parts of the song as loud as the loudest parts. This flattened out the sound of recordings and fooled listeners' brains into ignoring the stuff that wasn't there anymore, i.e., the resonant combinations of specific human beings producing different notes and sounds in specific spaces at sometimes ultraweird angles that the era of magnetic tape and vinyl had so successfully captured.

It's a long read, but quite interesting and he has thought about both the problem and solutions. More importantly he has been working to solve the problem, even if it may be an uphill fight.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Snotnose on Sunday August 25 2019, @12:46AM (1 child)

    by Snotnose (1623) on Sunday August 25 2019, @12:46AM (#884998)

    People who want the quality can get it - storage, processing power, and com speed are more than adequate to produce and use non-lossy high-quality recordings.

    Not really. When the only source the consumer has access to is over compressed then it doesn't matter the quality of your receiver, speakers, com speed, NAS size, whatever. If the original source sucks, then your best results will suck a bit less. Unless you have access to the master tapes, which takes a lot more money than that $1000 receiver, $2k speakers, and $200/month internet speed.

    --
    When the dust settled America realized it was saved by a porn star.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by ilPapa on Sunday August 25 2019, @02:35AM

    by ilPapa (2366) on Sunday August 25 2019, @02:35AM (#885035) Journal

    When the only source the consumer has access to is over compressed then it doesn't matter the quality of your receiver, speakers, com speed, NAS size, whatever

    But my ceramic cable elevators still matter, right? Please tell me they still matter.

    http://www.charismaaudio.com/?page_id=1728 [charismaaudio.com]

    --
    You are still welcome on my lawn.