Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday August 25 2019, @04:33AM   Printer-friendly
from the having-money-is-now-a-crime dept.

Australian senators who are tired of people spending their own money using cash want to put a stop to it with an audacious plan to limit cash transactions to $10,000 with a penalty of jail time for anyone who oversteps. This may sound a bit harsh, but what they really want to crack down on is the so-called 'black market' of cash transactions and dodgy people like drug dealers who have wads of cash stacked away and of course criminals who buy houses with suitcases of bills and then sell the house a while later effectively cleaning the money.

The first iteration of the proposal received significant criticism as personal transactions, such as buying a car, would be caught in the net. The Australian government has been clear about its intention to move society to cashless payments which benefits the government in many ways. Already in place are systems to force house buyers to lodge monies for properties with an escrow service (PEXA) where their money can be stolen with no recourse and no way to avoid the system.

If passed, the law would come into effect on January 1, 2020 and would apply to all cash payments made to businesses with an ABN. The penalties, jail time and fine would apply to both the individual and the business part of the transaction.

There are a couple of exemptions to the cash ban.

  • The $10,000 cash limit would not apply to individual-to-individual transactions, such as the private sale of a second-hand car.
  • The limit also wouldn't apply when depositing or withdrawing money from a bank.

[...] Head of CPA Australia, Dr Gary Pflugrath, agreed there needed to be a crackdown on the black economy but said linking criminal activity to all large cash transactions was "a step too far".

"This legislation is attempting to deal with a symptom, not the cause, of the black economy. While the use of cash in a large transaction may be an indicator of risk, it does not prove by itself that the behaviour is criminal," Dr Pflugrath said.

"The presumption that only tax evaders, money launderers and criminals use cash, and the mindset that these new offences are required to address criminality, has resulted in a proposed bill and instrument that run counter to well-established criminal law principles and have the potential to affect many Australians.

"The focus on criminalising certain cash transactions is an extreme response to the problem of avoiding scrutiny."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by NoMaster on Sunday August 25 2019, @11:20AM (2 children)

    by NoMaster (3543) on Sunday August 25 2019, @11:20AM (#885137)

    Australian senators

    I mean, really?

    Submitter didn't read the article and/or doesn't understand the Australian parliamentary system. The bill was drafted and introduced by a member of the Government in the House of Representatives, and the only senators* mentioned in the article are against it.

    (* Mind you, right as they are in this case, those particular two are minority ultra-right-wing conservating whackjob fruitloops - one of them is a sovereign citizen type who a couple of years ago didn't even know where he was a citizen of; the the other is his leader whose latest claim to fame is demonstrating an inability to walk downhill...)

    --
    Live free or fuck off and take your naïve Libertarian fantasies with you...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by fustakrakich on Sunday August 25 2019, @03:11PM (1 child)

    by fustakrakich (6150) on Sunday August 25 2019, @03:11PM (#885201) Journal

    ultra-right-wing conservating whackjob fruitloops

    Yeah, too bad we have to depend on crazy people to defend our rights.

    We had that in the States too, when we needed a bunch of republicans for vote for various civil rights acts in '65. And we also had some of them defending us against Clinton's V-Chip, or Clipper Chip, or both, who can remember? It was so long ago...

    --
    La politica e i criminali sono la stessa cosa..