SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the why-have-one-cheap-service-with-everything-when-you-could-have-117? dept.
Eight individuals have been charged with an indictment by the United States for allegedly running two of the "largest unauthorized streaming services".
The federal grand jury that gave the indictment alleges that the two streaming services, Jetflicks and iStreamItAll (ISIA), caused copyright owners to lose millions of dollars.
Both services were used by tens of thousands of subscribers, and could be accessed online and on numerous systems including smartphones, tablets, smart TVs, video game consoles, digital media players, set-top boxes, and web browsers.
Jetflicks allegedly obtained infringing television programs from pirate websites -- such as The Pirate Bay, RARBG and Torrentz -- by using automated computer scripts, and then would provide the pirated content to subscribers soon after the shows were aired.
ISIA allegedly used many of the same automated tools that Jetflicks employed to locate, download, process, and store illegal content -- but ISIA also provided movies in addition to television programs -- to quickly make pirated content available to ISIA subscribers.
The two services allegedly reproduced tens of thousands of copyrighted television episodes and movies without authorization, the Justice Department said, and distributed the infringing programs to tens of thousands of paid subscribers located throughout the US and Canada.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 29 2019, @02:29AM (3 children)
Copyright was created to grant you the legal right to sue those of your customers who willfully ignore the legal fiction of artificial scarcity. Good luck.
(Score: 2) by etherscythe on Thursday August 29 2019, @12:30PM (2 children)
Sure. And it came from a place of scarcity being somewhat less than artificial; students of history may recall hearing that books were once transcribed by hand, and curses were written inside the covers to ward off potential thieves. Hardcover books meant to last are still a little pricey - we just haven't figured out how this all works now that you can have an entire movie library on a handheld device, because the market dynamic has definitely changed.
There's a non-zero chance that I will be peddling my own copyrighted material at some point, and on that day I intend to be associated with positive value-added packaging, rather than the you're-just-a-paycheck-to-me deal we've come to expect. I mean, just because it's possible to make every product you sell carry with it a whiff of feces (or threat of litigation) doesn't mean it's a good idea.
"Fake News: anything reported outside of my own personally chosen echo chamber"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 29 2019, @12:57PM (1 child)
once the cost of copying something becomes negligible, people should be paid for generating the original copy, not for distributing the copies.
if I ever invent a car that costs 10 dollars to make, I have no problem with anyone using my plans, as long as they don't make a profit.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday August 29 2019, @02:55PM
Not going to work. That first copy is way too expensive for that model. Even an unedited novella takes more than a month of effort to write. Then there's all the other work involved in editing and publishing the book.
This whole business of complaining about distribution is mostly a way of rationalizing piracy. Part of what drives people to write books for free is the hope of it becoming a best seller and making them rich.
Yes, the system needs to be fixed, but paying people to write books in this fashion isn't going to work. The system already advances most of the payments to cover the production, this just removed any hope of profit in the venture