Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday August 30 2019, @03:20PM   Printer-friendly
from the what's-good-for-the-goose-is-good-for-the-gander dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

The battle over how to classify ride-hail drivers in California has intensified, with neither side backing down. After a caravan of drivers protested across the state earlier this week, Uber and Lyft began widely circulating online petitions on Wednesday. The companies' goal: Get people to join them in defeating Assembly Bill 5 as it's currently written before it becomes law.

If passed, the California state bill could allow for ride-hail drivers to be classified as employees rather than independent contractors, their current status.

"AB 5 may lead to hundreds of thousands of California Lyft drivers out of work," Lyft's petition reads. "As a result, passengers could wait longer for rides or risk losing reliable access to rideshare altogether."

Uber issued similar warnings in its petition and said, "Forcing all drivers to become employees could drastically change the rideshare experience as you've come to know it, and would limit Uber's ability to connect you with the dependable rides you've come to expect."

Uber and Lyft drivers are now classified as independent contractors, sometimes referred to as gig-workers, which means they don't get benefits including Social Security, health insurance, paid sick days and overtime. Many drivers say this system has led to exploitation. They say they've seen lower pay, higher costs and longer working hours as the cost of living has risen over the years.

Advocates for AB 5 call the ride-hailing companies' petitions a "misinformation campaign" and "dishonest." Mobile Workers Alliance and Gig Workers Rising, which have been organizing drivers around AB 5, say the bill is about workers' rights.

"Both of these companies are doing what looks like a very desperate last-ditch effort to try to get their customer base to go against drivers' rights," said Coral Itzcalli, spokeswoman for Mobile Workers Alliance. "The scheme of independent contractors is what companies have used for decades. What it does is saddle the cost of the business on the average worker."

[...] As an alternative to the bill, Uber said Wednesday that it would offer drivers a minimum wage of approximately $21 per hour. It also said it would offer access to benefits, such as paid time off, sick leave and compensation if injured while driving for the company. Additionally, Uber said it would let drivers have a "collective voice" at the company and the "ability to influence decisions about their work."

Lyft hasn't offered specifics, but it did say it'll give drivers a guaranteed earnings floor, a portable benefits fund and representation within the company.

Mobile Workers Alliance and Gig Workers Rising say $21 per hour isn't enough, however. As independent contractors, drivers have to cover all of their own expenses, including gas, car maintenance and repairs.

"It's not acceptable," said Leonardo Diaz, who's been driving for Uber and Lyft full-time for the last four years. "We are asking for $30 an hour to cover all the expenses."

Itzcalli from Mobile Workers Alliance agreed and said the ride-hailing companies' alternatives to AB 5 don't do enough to fulfill workers' rights.

"These companies tout themselves as being innovative and creating the jobs of tomorrow," she said. "But the reality is there is nothing innovative about worker exploitation."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Thexalon on Friday August 30 2019, @04:49PM

    by Thexalon (636) on Friday August 30 2019, @04:49PM (#887824)

    Also keep in mind that a lot of Uber and Lyft drivers do it for the personal contact. There are literally doctors and other professionals who do it for the experience, to socialize and talk to people from all walks of life.

    I know more than a few people who've driven for these services. In a nutshell: No, they don't. They do it for the money. If they want personal contact, they can find it at the pub, sporting events, clubs for every activity known to humanity, etc.

    And you're definitely living up to your name. No doctor I know personally, and none in their right mind would spend any time driving for a ride-sharing service. They get paid fairly well for their work, so they don't need the money, and they often work 80 hours a week, so by the time they get done with work they're exhausted and not really in the mood to socialize with drunken fools on their way home from the bar. In part because they get to meet the drunken fools on their way home from the bar shortly after they slam into a tree or get pulled into the hospital from the gutter they fell into from alcohol poisoning. The only doctors you'll find driving for ride-sharing services are those that are MDs and might have practiced in another country but aren't certified to practice medicine in the US because they haven't gone through a US residency program yet.

    And for what it's worth, the few times I've taken cabs, the drivers tended to be older African-Americans who were friendly enough. But that might just be where I am.

    --
    The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Troll=1, Insightful=2, Informative=1, Touché=1, Total=5
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5