Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Friday August 30 2019, @08:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the you-wouldn't-download-a-lifesaving-drug dept.

Submitted via IRC for SoyCow2718

Biohackers are pirating a cheap version of a million-dollar gene therapy (archive)

Citing the tremendous cost of new drugs, an international group of biohackers say they are creating a knock-off of a million-dollar gene therapy. The drug being copied is Glybera, a gene therapy that was the world's most expensive drug when it came on the market in Europe in 2015 with a $1 million per treatment price tag. Glybera was the first gene therapy ever approved to treat an inherited disease.

Now a band of independent and amateur biologists say they have engineered a prototype of a simpler, low-cost version of Glybera, and they plan to call on university and corporate scientists to help them check, improve, and test it on animals.

The group says it will start sharing the materials and describe their activities this weekend at Biohack the Planet, a conference in Las Vegas that hosts citizen scientists, journalists, and researchers for two days of presentations on body implants, biosafety, and hallucinogens. "This was developed in a shed in Mississippi, a warehouse in Florida, a bedroom in Indiana, and on a computer in Austria," says Gabriel Licina, a biohacker based in South Bend, Indiana. He says the prototype gene therapy cost less than $7,000 to create.

Experts briefed on the biohacking project were divided, with some calling it misguided and unlikely to work. Others say the excessive cost of genetic treatments has left patients without options and created an incentive to pirate genetic breakthroughs.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Pino P on Sunday September 01 2019, @02:56PM

    by Pino P (4721) on Sunday September 01 2019, @02:56PM (#888482) Journal

    MIT Technology Review is not included in my current subscription package, and last I checked, the website blocked access by users of privacy tools. But the summary appears to use "piracy" in the sense of infringement rather than armed robbery at sea.

    Since when is recreating an established or reverse-engineered method pirating?

    It's been infringement since the Patent Act became law.

    If that is pirating, why have the big computer pushers not been prosecuted for pirating all the competition? Why have the software developers and distributors not been trialed and hanged for their recreations of known programs?

    First, software patent lawsuits. Second, Oracle v. Google.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2