Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday August 31 2019, @05:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the ongoing-improvement dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE have once again succeeded in raising the efficiency value of monolithic triple-junction solar cells made of silicon and III-V semiconductor materials. Using a combination of multiple absorber materials, these multi-junction photovoltaic cells exploit the energy from the solar spectrum significantly better than conventional silicon solar cells. The world record for a monolithic multi-junction solar cell manufactured by wafer bonding has been increased to 34.1% and an efficiency record of 24.3% achieved for a solar cell with the III-V semiconductor layers deposited directly on the silicon.

“Monolithic multi-junction solar cells are a source of hope for the further development of the silicon solar cells dominating the field today because they can lead to significantly higher efficiency values when converting sunlight into electrical power. We believe that we can achieve efficiency values of 36%, which would substantially exceed the physical limit of 29.4% offered by a pure silicon solar cell,” explains Dr. Andreas Bett, Institute Director of Fraunhofer ISE. The high efficiency allows for more output per surface area, thus creating a savings of solar cell and module materials — an important aspect in regard to the sustainability of photovoltaics.

Triple-junction solar cells made of III-V semiconductors and silicon have the potential to take photovoltaics to a new level of efficiency.

For the production of multi-junction photovoltaic cells, thin III-V semiconductor layers only a few micrometers thick are deposited on a silicon solar cell. In order to optimally exploit the sun’s rays, the different layers absorb light from different spectral ranges: gallium indium phosphide in the 300–660 nm range (visible light), aluminum gallium arsenide in the 600–840 nm range (near infrared light) and silicon in the 800–1200 nm range (long-wavelength light).

This enables significantly increased efficiencies compared to single-junction silicon solar cells. Like today’s conventional silicon solar cells, these cells each have a contact on the front and rear sides, which allows for easy integration in solar modules.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Saturday August 31 2019, @09:51PM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Saturday August 31 2019, @09:51PM (#888322) Journal

    Make a low-cost, 5% efficient flexible panel that can be rolled up, and you have a winner.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 01 2019, @04:09PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 01 2019, @04:09PM (#888503)

    Seems like it doesn't matter to Soylentils, with only one reply before falling to end of first page...

    Some applications depend on cell efficiency:

    + Satellite power is one obvious place, grams saved in launch weight translates into $$$ savings

    + The solar powered cars that race across Australia (and other places) have limited area for cells. In the early days of this event (and maybe still, don't know) the winners used "space grade" cells at tremendous cost, often donated by the cell manufacturers. IIRC, 20% cell efficiency was a big deal back then.

    • (Score: 2) by slap on Tuesday September 03 2019, @03:14AM

      by slap (5764) on Tuesday September 03 2019, @03:14AM (#889089)

      Higher efficiency panels mean you need fewer of them. Fewer panels mean lower installation costs.