Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday September 01 2019, @10:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the whine-about-wine dept.

French vintners haven’t lived through such a succession of hot weather and dry harvests since at least the time of the Black Death in the 14th century.

Weather extremes that could now be considered normal for anybody under the age of 30 are unprecedented in historical records going back to when Europe was recovering from the pandemic that eviscerated the population. That’s the conclusion of researchers who examined temperature, grape harvest and wage data dating back to 1354, according to a study in the European Geosciences Union journal Climate of the Past.

“Outstanding hot and dry years in the past were outliers, while they have become the norm since the transition to rapid warming in 1988,” said the authors led by Thomas Labbe. Hotter temperatures over the last three decades have resulted in Burgundy grapes being harvested on average 13 days earlier than they were over the last 664 years, they said.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-29/burgundy-s-vineyards-haven-t-been-this-hot-since-the-black-death

Yet another parallel to the onset of the "Little Ice Age":

It has been conventionally defined as a period extending from the 16th to the 19th centuries,[3][4][5] but some experts prefer an alternative timespan from about 1300[6] to about 1850.[7][8][9]

[...]Another possibility is that there was a slowing of thermohaline circulation.[49][79][87][88] The circulation could have been interrupted by the introduction of a large amount of fresh water into the North Atlantic, possibly caused by a period of warming before the Little Ice Age known as the Medieval Warm Period.[31][89][90] There is some concern that a shutdown of thermohaline circulation could happen again as a result of the present warming period.[91][92]

Solar cycle 24 had the fewest sunspots since cycle 6 (~1810-1822)[1], and cycle 25 is predicted to be 30-50% weaker[2] than that which would be as weak as the tail end of the Maunder minimum (cycle -4, ~1700-1712). There really isn't any good data on what the sun was doing earlier than that but there are reports that the prior 50 years had almost no sunspots at all.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
[2] http://www.sidc.be/silso/datafiles
[3] https://www.nasa.gov/feature/ames/solar-activity-forecast-for-next-decade-favorable-for-exploration


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Troll) by NickM on Sunday September 01 2019, @09:09PM (3 children)

    by NickM (2867) on Sunday September 01 2019, @09:09PM (#888592) Journal
    Why as a Canadian should I lift a finger when Canada is going to the a place that will benefit from hotter temperature ( https://business.financialpost.com/opinion/joe-oliver-heres-a-truth-few-dare-to-utter-canada-will-benefit-from-climate-change [financialpost.com] https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/media/article/2019/economic-implications-of-climate-change.pdf [moodysanalytics.com] ). The mainstream media interpreted the Moody's study with shallow article like that one https://globalnews.ca/news/5836813/climate-change-cost-to-canada/ [globalnews.ca] whoose main point is

    ... such an approach ignored the consequences of a warming climate on the rest of the world, of which Canada is only one out of 194 others, many of which are poorer and identified by the Moody’s report as being more likely to suffer significantly from climate change...

    As if the poor people already suffering in place like Ethiopia would better off in a slightly hotter climate than dead from the change in climate. That money wasted by Canada on reducing co2 should be spent on real polluants causing mesurables damages, like particulate matter (pm2.5 causing smog), estrogen mimicking plastifiants, cancer causing surfactants and the like. It should also be spent on border protection and artic sovereignty, to protect us from those future climate change refugees. So alarmist drivel be damend and let's think about how us (people who live in developed countries) can take advantage of the incoming changes. It's already to late to change anyway, so we should be preparing ourself instead of trying to delay the inevitable.

    --
    I a master of typographic, grammatical and miscellaneous errors !
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Troll=1, Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 01 2019, @09:39PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday September 01 2019, @09:39PM (#888602)

    What? Too late to do anything? Unlucky ones will have to die?
    Then guess #malthusWasRight

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 02 2019, @05:25AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 02 2019, @05:25AM (#888728)

    Watch out for Americans moving north and buying thousands of acres of your land. Some of us understand that you have resources and soon you'll have the best climate.

    • (Score: 2) by kazzie on Monday September 02 2019, @08:34AM

      by kazzie (5309) Subscriber Badge on Monday September 02 2019, @08:34AM (#888768)

      Especially now that Greenland's not on the market any more...