Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday September 03 2019, @10:45PM   Printer-friendly
from the don't-break-the-brakes dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

More than many other auto parts, brake discs are subject to repeated mechanical loads. As a result of this continual abrasion, they produce fine particulate matter, which pose a substantial environmental burden. Now, however, a new coating process developed by the Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology ILT and RWTH Aachen University can significantly reduce this impact. By using "Extreme High-speed Laser Material Deposition", known by its German acronym EHLA, it has proved possible to provide brake discs with an effective protection against wear and corrosion in a procedure that is both fast and economic.

Traditional coating processes such as electroplating or thermal spraying. The problem with such processes is that they do not produce a metallurgical bond between the cast iron and the protective coating; moreover, they are expensive and use a lot of materials.

Now, however, a new process avoids these drawbacks. Developed by Fraunhofer ILT in Aachen, together with the Chair for Digital Additive Production DAP at RWTH Aachen University, it is known as Extreme High-speed Laser Material Deposition (EHLA).

[...] Coatings produced with conventional processes have pores and cracks. With the EHLA process, the coating remains intact and therefore provides longer and more effective protection for the component. This increases service life and prevents early failure as a result of damage to the surface of the brake disc. Moreover, the process is suitable for a wide range of materials. Therefore, it is possible to select an environmentally friendly coating for each specific application.

The EHLA process is a new process variant on the well-known laser material deposition, which has proved highly successful in areas such as the repair of turbine blades. EHLA does, however, have a number of decisive advantages. With the EHLA process, the powder particles of the coating material are melted directly in the laser beam, rather than in a melt pool on the surface of the component. Since the melt pool now is fed by liquid drops of material rather than solid particles of powder, the coating process is much faster, rising from the 0.5–2 meters per minute with conventional laser material deposition to as much as 500 meters per minute.

This also substantially reduces the exposure to heat of the material being coated. Unlike conventional laser material deposition, where the heat affected zone can have a depth of one or more millimeters, thermal exposure with the EHLA process remains in the micrometer range. This enables the use of entirely new material combinations such as coatings for aluminum or—as with the brake discs—cast-iron alloys.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by RS3 on Wednesday September 04 2019, @02:01AM

    by RS3 (6367) on Wednesday September 04 2019, @02:01AM (#889351)

    A few years ago I took a friends vehicle in for inspection, and of course, they said I needed new rotors. Nevermind there's a HUGE pile of rotors in the back of the shop. They don't even try to lathe turn them anymore.

    Being I was in the Boy Scouts briefly as a kid, I try to "be prepared" and I had a micrometer with me. I had already measured the rotors and they were pretty much full thickness. The shop idiot insisted they were way thin, so he brought me back to the computer and showed me. I showed him that spec was for the AWD version which used a completely different rotor and all of the suspension. And nevermind that the minimum thickness was clearly cast into the side of the rotor, but they tried to say the computer was right and the casting was wrong. I finally won the argument when I made them look up the RWD and AWD rotors and compare specs. The "computer" was "AllData", which is provided by AutoZone. Slight conflict of interest maybe?

    I feel strongly that repair shops should not be allowed to also inspect.

    Ceramic pads make less dust and came about because of fancy aluminum rims. I don't use them. But, I have to admit rotors have gotten very inexpensive, often cheaper than medium-priced pads, like usually less than $30, and often less than $20. (I occasionally work on friend's cars...)

    I (still) have a 1989 Chevy and the original rotors lasted 165,000+ miles. Never used ceramic pads of course.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4