Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday September 04 2019, @04:13AM   Printer-friendly
from the Ruh-Roh!-What-happens-now? dept.

Boris Johnson loses Parliamentary majority, faces Brexit showdown

Britain's Parliament returns from its summer recess and is facing a titanic showdown over Prime Minister Boris Johnson's plans to leave the European Union. Here's what we know:

● Johnson has lost his majority in Parliament, with the defection of Conservative Phillip Lee to the Liberal Democrats.

● The opposition, including members of Johnson's party, is seeking to pass legislation to delay Brexit.

● Johnson has said that if his foes succeed he will call early elections.

Live coverage.

List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom by length of tenure

#54: George Canning, 119 days (1827)
#55: Boris Johnson, 40 days (Incumbent) (2019)

See also: Brexit: Tory MP defects ahead of crucial no-deal vote
How Brexit Blew Up Britain's Constitution


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by bradley13 on Wednesday September 04 2019, @07:45AM (9 children)

    by bradley13 (3053) on Wednesday September 04 2019, @07:45AM (#889411) Homepage Journal

    If nothing else, a general election would bring clarity. It would be, in effect, a second Brexit referendum.

    The pro-Brexit people claim that a majority of the population is behind the idea, and it's just stupid politicians standing in the way. The anti-Brexit people claim that the referendum was poorly presented, poorly understood, and that the voters would take it back if they could. An election will give the voters the chance to tell Parliament very clearly what they want.

    --
    Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Arik on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:08AM

    by Arik (4543) on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:08AM (#889419) Journal
    This is probably the healthiest way to look at it.

    Few on either side will look at it this way, I fear.

    The Brexiteers (and even many Remainers) will point out that there's no doubt in anyone's mind that if the referendum had failed that would have been the end of it. For a generation, at least, and after a generation it would be unlikely to come up again.

    But it doesn't work the other way. This is one of the profoundly anti-democratic practices of the EU that helped to inspire Brexit; there are votes, but there are predetermined outcomes to the votes, and if you (the voters) don't get it right then you can just keep voting until you do.

    And of course the Remainers (not all, but many) aren't going to be any more inclined to accept the results of the next vote than they were the last, if it goes against them.
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:48AM (5 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:48AM (#889440) Journal

    If nothing else, a general election would bring clarity.

    It may but again it may not.
    The Brexit is in shambles because the Brexiteers don't have a clear and coherent set of objectives they want to achieve. Pretty much like the Occupy... movements at the depth of GFC, they knew they don't want the same wall Street shenanigans any more, but couldn't tell what they want instead.

    If Brexit wins again, this can drag on indeterminately.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:53AM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 04 2019, @08:53AM (#889442)

      I went to occupy once. They wanted to give more money and power to the same people who screwed them over the first time.

      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday September 04 2019, @09:01AM (1 child)

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 04 2019, @09:01AM (#889445) Journal

        Chances are, the next day after you were there, they wanted the opposite.

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Thexalon on Wednesday September 04 2019, @11:59AM (1 child)

      by Thexalon (636) on Wednesday September 04 2019, @11:59AM (#889492)

      The Brexit is in shambles because the Brexiteers don't have a clear and coherent set of objectives they want to achieve.

      Yes they do: Those clear and coherent set of objectives were to give Boris Johnson and the likes of Nigel Farage the power to do whatever they want without interference from those jerks in Brussels, without any negative consequences for the UK economy.

      That these objectives are stupid and unachievable doesn't change what the point was.

      --
      The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
      • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Wednesday September 04 2019, @09:34PM

        by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 04 2019, @09:34PM (#889702) Journal

        without interference from those jerks in Brussels, without any negative consequences for the UK economy.

        They may be clear but they are self-contradictory (at least ATM), therefore not coherent.

        --
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 04 2019, @11:29AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 04 2019, @11:29AM (#889486)

    The anti-Brexit people claim that the referendum was poorly presented, poorly understood, and that the voters would take it back if they could.

    Yet guess what happens when that argument is made regarding the FUD campaign the self-same motley crew of anti-brexiteers mounted wearing their 'better together' hats during the Scottish Independence referendum and the outright lies they told to swing that vote? (e.g. The relevant biggie here being the only way Scotland would be able to stay in the EU was to vote to No and keep the UK alive..)

    tossers, the lot of them.

    The problem with a general election now, as is obvious by the way Labour are running scared and don't want it, is that it will return a seriously right of centre government to the UK, and that will be taken as a mandate for all the fun things that the powers behind the Boris muppet have in store for us all. Personally, I think we're fucked whatever happens now, I just curse the fact that the Irish side of my family stopped registering their births back there, so the Irish passport is out of the question.

  • (Score: 1) by therainingmonkey on Wednesday September 04 2019, @03:06PM

    by therainingmonkey (6839) on Wednesday September 04 2019, @03:06PM (#889555)

    I wouldn't count on it.
    Remember we had an election in 2017 which, if anything, only reduced clarity.